MathGroup Archive 2009

[Date Index] [Thread Index] [Author Index]

Search the Archive

Opportunities and Player Pro

  • To: mathgroup at
  • Subject: [mg104371] Opportunities and Player Pro
  • From: "E. Martin-Serrano" <eMartinSerrano at>
  • Date: Thu, 29 Oct 2009 02:58:18 -0500 (EST)

I wish to join the opinion already expressed here on that WRI should provide
the means to make available to people, in general, any products developed
with Mathematica,  allowing to manipulate all or most of the dynamic
graphics and other stuff in them. The lack of this free tool which would
make possible wide distribution of these materials severely restricts the
opportunities to use Mathematica for many purposes.

It is true that Mathematica Player Pro is already available, and that it is
the professional platform for running interactive Mathematica applications
and documents and for interacting with reports and documents. It is also
true that, Player Pro is an application delivery system and that it can
be used to deliver tools, and so on. But, in the end, all this is
restricted to a closed and, to certain extent, comparatively tiny community
of already Player Pro users.

But think about, say,  a book on some scientific and technical matter, meant
to be distributed in many countries, written in Spanish, English, Russian,
French, German, Arabic, Italian, Chinese, Japanese, and others. Let us
suppose that it is an outstanding book targeted to a wide spectrum of
persons and institutions: including academics, professionals, and students;
plus people in general too.  And, let suppose that the authors are
considering including in the book, as an addendum, the sort of dynamic
graphics and some other computational material that Mathematica could

Taking apart the fact that some potential purchasers of the book would
actually be current Mathematica users; does anyone really think that it
makes any sense including Mathematica as an important tool for the project
and tied it to a preexistent and closed community of already Player Pro

I would really like to be in a situation of defending the Mathematica way
since I believe it would be nearly the best one, both for readers (including
students) and lecturers; but I cannot. It seems that for projects like this
there is a long way to go yet.

E. Martin-Serrano


This e-mail and the documents attached are confidential and intended
solely for the addressee; it may also be privileged. If you receive
this e-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately and destroy it.
As its integrity cannot be secured on the Internet, E. Mart=EDn-Serrano
liability cannot be triggered for the message content. Although
the sender endeavours to maintain a computer virus-free network,
the sender does not warrant that this transmission is virus-free and
will not be liable for any damages resulting from any virus transmitted. 

Este mensaje y los ficheros adjuntos pueden contener informacion
destinada solamente a la(s) persona(s) mencionadas anteriormente
pueden estar protegidos por secreto profesional.
Si usted recibe este correo electronico por error, gracias por informar
inmediatamente al remitente y destruir el mensaje.
Al no estar asegurada la integridad de este mensaje sobre la red, E.
Mart=EDn-Serrano no se hace responsable por su contenido. Su contenido no
constituye ningun
compromiso para el remitente, salvo ratificacion escrita por ambas partes.
Aunque se esfuerza al maximo por mantener su red libre de virus, el emisor
no puede garantizar nada al respecto y no sera responsable de cualesquiera
da=F1os que puedan resultar de una transmision de virus.

  • Prev by Date: Re: Working with Lists
  • Next by Date: Re: How to find the kinks in a list
  • Previous by thread: Re: Version 7 Virtual Book
  • Next by thread: ReplaceAll evaluation