MathGroup Archive 2010

[Date Index] [Thread Index] [Author Index]

Search the Archive

Re: Generalization of Variables ?

  • To: mathgroup at
  • Subject: [mg109239] Re: Generalization of Variables ?
  • From: Bob Hanlon <hanlonr at>
  • Date: Sun, 18 Apr 2010 05:59:36 -0400 (EDT)

variables[expr_] :=
   expr, _Symbol?(! NumericQ[#] &), Infinity]]

expr = x + E^y + Sin[x*Pi];



Bob Hanlon

---- Jack L Goldberg 1 <jackgold at> wrote: 

Hi Folks,

The built-in command "Variables" does not give the (naively expected)  
answer when it is called with functions such as x + Sin[x].  This  
behavior is mentioned in the description of "Variables".
I have constructed a generalization of "Variables" which works as  
expected - I think?  I would appreciated a critique of this code which  
addresses these issues:

a) Is there a situation in which it fails?

b) If the code works, can it be improved.

Question b) is asked because I am not fully acquainted with all of  
Mathematica's commands.

Here is the code.

variables[f_]:= Flatten[

I have tried "variables" on functions coded in the obvious manner, say,
Sin[x]+Exp[x^2],  Sin[x+y]-z^2, etc. and a few esoteric examples.


  • Prev by Date: Tracking dynamic trigger
  • Next by Date: Re: Where is the code for DistanceMatrix?
  • Previous by thread: Generalization of Variables ?
  • Next by thread: Re: Generalization of Variables ?