MathGroup Archive 2010

[Date Index] [Thread Index] [Author Index]

Search the Archive

Re: Root again

  • To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
  • Subject: [mg109129] Re: Root again
  • From: Scott Hemphill <hemphill at hemphills.net>
  • Date: Mon, 19 Apr 2010 04:08:21 -0400 (EDT)
  • References: <hps1an$6fv$1@smc.vnet.net> <hq0mn0$jtd$1@smc.vnet.net>
  • Reply-to: hemphill at alumni.caltech.edu

Scott Hemphill <hemphill at hemphills.net> writes:

[snip]

> Anyway, the roots aren't all real for any choice of t.
>
> If y = x^6 + t*x + 1, then D[y,x] == 6x^5 + t and D[y,x,x] == 30x^4.
> Since D[y,x,x] is non-negative, D[y,x] will be monotonically increasing.
> Since D[y,x] always has exactly one real zero, y will have exactly one
> minimum.  It can therefore have zero, one, or two real roots.
>
>
>   In[1]:= y=x^6+t*x+1
>
>                      6
>   Out[1]= 1 + t x + x
>
>
> We can find the minimum by solving for the location where the derivative
> is zero.
>
>
>   In[2]:= Reduce[D[y,x]==0,x,Reals]
>
>   Out[2]= x == Root[t + 6 #1  & , 1]

My cut and paste missed a line here.  This should read:

                          5
Out[2]= x == Root[t + 6 #1  & , 1]

> We can find the critical values for t for which the minimum occurs at y==0.
>
>
>   In[3]:= Reduce[(y/.Rule@@%)==0,t]
>
>                 -6           6
>   Out[3]= t == ---- || t == ----
>                 5/6          5/6
>                5            5
>
>   In[4]:= N[%]
>
>   Out[4]= t == -1.56919 || t == 1.56919
>
> So at these two values of t, y will have just one real root.  In between
> them there will be no real roots (e.g. t==0 => y==x^6+1 has no real
> roots) and outside these two values of t there will be two real roots.

Scott
-- 
Scott Hemphill	hemphill at alumni.caltech.edu
"This isn't flying.  This is falling, with style."  -- Buzz Lightyear


  • Prev by Date: Re: if using Mathematica to solve an algebraic problem
  • Next by Date: Re: Converting the integral of a sum into a sum of integrals
  • Previous by thread: Re: Root again
  • Next by thread: Re: Root again