|
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
[Author Index]
Re: A new graphic user interface
- To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
- Subject: [mg111672] Re: A new graphic user interface
- From: Helen Read <hpr at together.net>
- Date: Mon, 9 Aug 2010 05:16:35 -0400 (EDT)
- References: <i3gpp1$2v0$1@smc.vnet.net> <i3jc57$d03$1@smc.vnet.net> <i3m40f$hln$1@smc.vnet.net>
- Reply-to: HPR <read at math.uvm.edu>
On 8/8/2010 7:21 AM, telefunkenvf14 wrote:
>
> One related example, which I believe emphasizes my point: When
> students jump into using palettes they're able to create a pile of poo
> rather quickly----a pile they cannot possibly debug due to the fact
> they've never absorbed 'everything is an expression'. Clinging to the
> pointy-clicky route also makes the documentation seem very foreign to
> new users.
I think the Documentation always was foreign to new users, and don't see
that as a problem. How many new users can get much useful information
from the documentation for say MS Office? Most people are going to start
off doing very basic things, will click around the various menus trying
to find whatever they are looking for, and will ask someone more
knowledgeable for help if they get stuck. They will only consult the
documentation later, when they have figured out the basics and need help
with something more complicated.
Similarly, I find that my students don't go into the Mathematica
Documentation at all when they first start out, and with the new
palettes they don't need to. It's not until later, when they know what
that they are doing, that they use the Documentation. The Classroom
Assistant Palette helps them get to that point more easily. On Day 1, I
show them their way around in the Classroom Assistant and get them up
and running with no discussion of syntax. I get them defining functions,
making tables and plots, using Solve, and a couple of other things. I
don't say a word about braces and brackets, spelling with capital
letters, etc. at this stage. They gradually stop relying on the
pointy-clicky palette over a period of a few weeks, having picked up the
syntax almost subliminally. Most of them figure out the use of capital
letters, square brackets, etc., on their own, without having to ask.
When they get to that point, they *are* able to figure out what's wrong
when they mess something up, or their friend sitting next to them can
spot a mistake if they cannot. I don't encourage or even really mention
the Documentation until they have gotten to that point.
> I have nothing against using palettes, but things need to
> be learned in proper order. In this regard, trying to make the
> interface more like MS Word will, in the long run, hurt new users and
> the reputation of the software.
I agree. Making it more like Word would be a big mistake.
> 1. DPI scaling in Windows is a mess. (for many different pieces of
> software, not just Mathematica) A lot of programs are locked into the 96 DPI
> world. My new laptop is 1920x1080, which looks great, except that
> fonts become way too small in Mathematica. To compensate for this I have
> adjusted the default Magnification to 1.5----as a result, the
> notebooks look PERFECT, but the documentation center now looks like
> CRAP (distorted). Adjusting the system wide Windows DPI scaling causes
> similar problems. Suggestion: could WRI just make it so users can 'run
> through' the documentation center, re-evaluating all the examples and
> saving the output to the doc center? I can easily imagine this would
> be problematic. Regardless, a suggestion.
I have *always* found the default font sizes to be too small. I use a
custom stylesheet for some of the assignments I give the students, and
of course I have the fonts set to a reasonable size there. But that
means that I do not set the default magnification to 1.5, because then
those fonts are too big. Instead I just click on the magnification along
the bottom of each notebook and crank it up to 150%. I do it so
habitually that I don't even think about it. One of the first things the
students ask when they start working in blank notebooks (which happens
within the first week) isn't "How come this looks different?" but "How
do I make it bigger?"
> 2. Stylesheets need to be easier to create and alter
That would be nice.
> (without fear
> that your going to screw something up---this is frustrating and extra
> confusing for new users.)
I don't think a new user could do it at all, the way it is now.
> (ii) I'd also like to be able to
> bookmark locations in the documentation and save scraps of customized
> code ideas, tagged to those bookmarks. I know this would cut down on
> the mountain of scrap notebooks I have!!
Yes, yes. I've been wanting to bookmark pages in the Documentation for
ages, and your idea of saving your own examples tagged to the bookmarks
is terrific. Half the time I can't find the little notebooks of my own
examples that I have saved (on several different computers, which
doesn't help).
I only recently discovered that right-clicking in the Documentation
gives an option to Open in New Window. I wonder how long that has been
there? I had been going back up to the Help menu to open up a a new
Documentation center window. It would be helpful if there were a button
somewhere for opening a new window, so that people don't have to stumble
on it by accident. Better yet, would be the ability to Open in New Tab,
with a button for it and a right-click option. I'd like to have several
tabs open in the Documentation center, so that I could go back and forth
among the tabs instead of lots of windows.
--
Helen Read
University of Vermont
Prev by Date:
Re: A new graphic user interface
Next by Date:
Re: Suggestions
Previous by thread:
Re: A new graphic user interface
Next by thread:
Re: A new graphic user interface
|