MathGroup Archive 2010

[Date Index] [Thread Index] [Author Index]

Search the Archive

Re: More /.{I->-1} craziness

  • To: mathgroup at
  • Subject: [mg106122] Re: More /.{I->-1} craziness
  • From: Noqsi <jpd at>
  • Date: Sat, 2 Jan 2010 05:04:25 -0500 (EST)
  • References: <> <hhhmn8$o9t$>

On Jan 1, 3:39 am, Richard Fateman <fate... at> wrote:
> Leonid Shifrin wrote:
> ...
> > I think that there are not many more objects in Mathematica which are a=
> > tricky as <I> or Infinity in terms of pattern-matching.
> I agree.
> That's why it can be fixed.
> Here's a beginning of a short list for the "we're not just talking
> syntactic replacement-- version of substitution":
> If the user says   -i --> i,   then do  Complex[a_,-b_] -> Complex[=
> If the user says   x^2 --> y,  then do  x^(-2)-> 1/y    also.
> I assume this list can be enlarged somewhat, and could even be left
> open-ended by user option of some sort.  [e.g. should x^2--> y   also
> change x^3 to x*y?   or to y^(3/2) or ....]

No! The language should not attempt to outsmart the user. What you're
proposing would be the nastiest sort of bug, changing simple,
predictable behavior into something that would play out in
incomprehensible ways. Syntactic replacement is very, very useful and
should not be polluted by attempts to read the user's mind.

The principle here has always been "You want to see what a rule will
really do? Look at FullForm." Perhaps the documentation should
highlight this better, but this behavior is NOT A BUG.

  • Prev by Date: Re: Uninstalling/Reinstalling Mathematica 7?
  • Next by Date: Re: More /.{I->-1} craziness
  • Previous by thread: Re: Re: More /.{I->-1} craziness
  • Next by thread: Re: Re: More /.{I->-1} craziness