|
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
[Author Index]
Re: More /.{I->-1} craziness
- To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
- Subject: [mg106298] Re: More /.{I->-1} craziness
- From: Vince Virgilio <blueschi at gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 7 Jan 2010 02:34:10 -0500 (EST)
- References: <200912300915.EAA17299@smc.vnet.net> <hhhmn8$o9t$1@smc.vnet.net>
On Jan 6, 5:59 am, Richard Fateman <fate... at cs.berkeley.edu> wrote:
SNIP
>
> What I would say is
>
> Because of the disparity in internal representations (see below) ,
> for replacements on parts of complex expressions, don't use /. ...
> use /. BetterRules[ ...]
>
This expects too much from ReplaceAll.
> or use transformation or selection programs such as Conjugate, Im, Re, .. .
>
Yes. Not unlike something Andrzej said elsewhere about
PolynomialReduce (others said similar as well).
SNIP
Vince Virgilio
(
Incidentally, my FullForm of x+4*I differs from yours, if I read yours
correctly:
In[1]:= x+4I//FullForm
Out[1]//FullForm= Plus[Complex[0,4],x]
)
Prev by Date:
Integrate 'learns'?
Next by Date:
Re: FullForm puzzle.
Previous by thread:
Re: Re: More /.{I->-1} craziness
Next by thread:
Re: More /.{I->-1} craziness
|