Mathematica 9 is now available
Services & Resources / Wolfram Forums / MathGroup Archive
-----

MathGroup Archive 2010

[Date Index] [Thread Index] [Author Index]

Search the Archive

Re: Re: More /.{I->-1} craziness

  • To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
  • Subject: [mg106552] Re: [mg106525] Re: More /.{I->-1} craziness
  • From: Daniel Lichtblau <danl at wolfram.com>
  • Date: Sat, 16 Jan 2010 06:10:50 -0500 (EST)
  • References: <hhf5s3$h4o$1@smc.vnet.net> <hhhmhl$o48$1@smc.vnet.net> <201001150820.DAA29809@smc.vnet.net>

AES wrote:
> In article <hhhmhl$o48$1 at smc.vnet.net>,
>  Valeri Astanoff <astanoff at gmail.com> wrote:
> 
>> Imho, when applying a rule  lhs -> rhs
>> it's a risky practice to use the same symbol
>> in 'lhs' and 'rhs', because, very often, there is
>> no easy way to check what has been done.
>>
>> Anyway, for occasional users, you're right : it's crazy!
>>
> 
> Thank you -- that's really my primary point.  
> 
> And I'd add: it's damaging (to users, and to Mathematica).
> 
> As for writing rules, I'd not even try writing something compound, like 
> a + b or especially something like 1 + I, on the lhs, because I'd have 
> no intuition as to how this would work (how spaces would be handled, 
> etc.)
> 
> But a single character on the lhs?  It works correctly AFAIK for every 
> other single-character in the alphabet.  Why shouldn't one expect it to 
> work for I?

"[W]ork for me" (let's try to use correct grammar here).

In[1]:= D[Sin[x], x] /. D -> f
Out[1]= Cos[x]

In[3]:= Exp[I*Pi] /. Pi -> E
Out[3]= -1

In[4]:= Exp[I*Pi] /. I -> E
Out[4]= -1

In[5]:= N[Pi] /. N -> P
Out[5]= 3.14159

In[14]:= Cos[x] + O[x]^2 /. O -> P
Out[14]= SeriesData[x, 0, {1}, 0, 2, 1]

Daniel Lichtblau
Wolfram Research


  • Prev by Date: Re: Re: Simplify with NestedLessLess?
  • Next by Date: Re: Question about Mathematica
  • Previous by thread: Re: More /.{I->-1} craziness
  • Next by thread: Re: More /.{I->-1} craziness