MathGroup Archive 2010

[Date Index] [Thread Index] [Author Index]

Search the Archive

Re: More /.{I->-1} craziness

  • To: mathgroup at
  • Subject: [mg106735] Re: More /.{I->-1} craziness
  • From: AES <siegman at>
  • Date: Fri, 22 Jan 2010 05:38:03 -0500 (EST)
  • Organization: Stanford University
  • References: <> <hhhmn8$o9t$> <hhpl28$9lf$> <hip8gf$t4d$> <8304354.1263643340634.JavaMail.root@n11> <hiuur1$919$> <hj130e$bcn$> <> <hj6qf0$8qo$> <hj981f$fo3$>

In article <hj981f$fo3$1 at>,
 Richard Fateman <fateman at> wrote:

> The success of such courses obviously depend on the enthusiasm, energy, 
> and charisma of the teachers. To what extent does it depend on the 
> computing aspect?
> In the absence of a controlled experiment, it is hard to convince 
> skeptics.  Even the experiments that might be tried would probably be 
> flawed -- e.g. two sections of the same course -- may be defective if 
> the better students self-select to come to the "experimental 
> computer-based" course. 

Old (and well-tested) maxim:  "All educational experiments are big 
successes for the first two or three years ­­ then they disappear 

[Anyone on this group remember (or use) the Keller Plan for 
student-paced learning


 ­­ and the hype it got at MIT in the 1970s?]

  • Prev by Date: Re: How To invert ColorFunction
  • Next by Date: Re: Re: Sorting paired columns of dates and values
  • Previous by thread: Re: Re: More /.{I->-1} craziness
  • Next by thread: Re: Re: More /.{I->-1} craziness