Re: precedence for ReplaceAll?
- To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
- Subject: [mg110890] Re: precedence for ReplaceAll?
- From: AES <siegman at stanford.edu>
- Date: Sat, 10 Jul 2010 04:01:15 -0400 (EDT)
- References: <i0u02s$jt2$1@smc.vnet.net> <201007081049.GAA16327@smc.vnet.net> <i16vlq$iu4$1@smc.vnet.net>
In article <i16vlq$iu4$1 at smc.vnet.net>, Andrzej Kozlowski <akozlowski at gmail.com> wrote: > On 8 Jul 2010, at 19:49, Peter Pein wrote: > > > Am Tue, 6 Jul 2010 09:03:11 +0000 (UTC) > > schrieb AES <siegman at stanford.edu>: > > > >> In article <i0u02s$jt2$1 at smc.vnet.net>, > >> Bill Rowe <readnews at sbcglobal.net> wrote: > >> > >> DON'T under any circumstances click on > >> <http://arstechnica.com/software/news/2009/03/stephen-wolfram-and-the-tec hno-dianetics-of-google-ology.ars> > >> > >> May cause serious medical damage. > >> > > > > OK, I didn't. Did I miss something > > ? > > > Can't you read? You avoided serious medical damage. The warning was personal to Bill Rowe, not necessarily to others (and, a way to sneak the URL into cssmm).
- References:
- Re: precedence for ReplaceAll?
- From: Peter Pein <petsie@dordos.net>
- Re: precedence for ReplaceAll?