|
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
[Author Index]
What's wrong with this assuming?
- To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
- Subject: [mg111095] What's wrong with this assuming?
- From: Sam Takoy <sam.takoy at yahoo.com>
- Date: Tue, 20 Jul 2010 03:43:07 -0400 (EDT)
Hi,
I have a situation where I have to simplify an expression that contains
x and h, but x is given implicitly by h, so I can't explicitly eliminate
it. So here's a simpler example that I'm trying and it does nothing:
Assuming[x^2 + x == h, (x^2 + x)^2+h] // FullSimplify
Is there a way to make this work?
Thanks!
Prev by Date:
Re: Transform differential equation by tranformation rule
Next by Date:
Re: Problems with Workbench Debugger Breakpoints
Previous by thread:
Re: Problems with Workbench Debugger Breakpoints
Next by thread:
Re: What's wrong with this assuming?
|