Re: WORKBENCH VS MATHEMATICA
- To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
- Subject: [mg110352] Re: WORKBENCH VS MATHEMATICA
- From: David Reiss <dbreiss at gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 15 Jun 2010 02:28:01 -0400 (EDT)
- References: <firstname.lastname@example.org>
I generally use Mathematica -- even for projects of quite considerable size (tens of thousands of lines of Mathematica code). I can organize things within a notebook far more efficiently and document things directly within the notebook to provide detailed reminders to myself of the reasons why I chose the methods that I did. I use http://www.scientificarts.com/worklife (which, indeed itself is one of those very large applications) to be able to move the package from its development directory to the various Mathematica Applications directories, adn to be able to load and reload the package iteratively as I develop it. --David On Jun 13, 4:11 am, "J and B" <noslow... at comcast.net> wrote: > In writing code which is the preferred method, Work Bench or Mathematica? > > In ether one, why do you use it vs. the other?