MathGroup Archive 2010

[Date Index] [Thread Index] [Author Index]

Search the Archive

Re: Fourier transform of exponential function

  • To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
  • Subject: [mg108639] Re: Fourier transform of exponential function
  • From: "Kevin J. McCann" <Kevin.McCann at umbc.edu>
  • Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2010 06:32:23 -0500 (EST)
  • References: <hofg7f$f89$1@smc.vnet.net>

I suggest that you look at the integral you are trying to do. It is not 
clear from your post whether you mean to have t run from zero to 
infinity or from minus infinity to infinity. In the latter case, the 
integral does not converge, and this is what corresponds to your 
example. I suspect that you mean to take the FT of exp(-t) for t>0, i.e. 
the function is zero for negative t. If that is so, you could try

FourierTransform[UnitStep[t] Exp[-t], t, w]

with result:

I/(Sqrt[2 \[Pi]] (I + w))

I am not sure why V5 and V7 give different results. Perhaps it is a 
feature ;).

Kevin

ALittleDog wrote:
> I am trying to do a Fourier transform of a simple exponential
> function, by using the following code:
> FourierTransform[Exp[-t], t, =F9]
> By Mahtematica 5.0, I obtain
> \sqrt(2 Pi) DiracDelta[ I + =F9 ]
> By Mathematica 7.0, I obtain a repetition of the original input as
> FourierTransform[Exp[-t], t, =F9].
> 
> I search to look for a classical solution, but most of them are
> talking about FourierTransform[Exp[-Abs[t]], t, =F9]. Indeed, what is
> the classical solution of this problem? Why 5.0 version and 7.0
> version try to figure it out in a different manner? Thanks!
> 
> 
> 


  • Prev by Date: Re: estimation
  • Next by Date: Multiple Window Feature Request
  • Previous by thread: Re: Fourier transform of exponential function
  • Next by thread: Re: Fourier transform of exponential function