MathGroup Archive 2010

[Date Index] [Thread Index] [Author Index]

Search the Archive

Re: Dot product confusion

  • To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
  • Subject: [mg109953] Re: Dot product confusion
  • From: Christopher Arthur <aarthur at tx.rr.com>
  • Date: Wed, 26 May 2010 07:09:06 -0400 (EDT)

try putting the vector in braces like this {{a},{b},{c}}
for a column vector into a row vector

S. B. Gray a =E9crit :
> Given
>
> ptsa == {{x1, y1, z1}, {x2, y2, z2}, {x3, y3, z3}};
>
> I  thought the following expressions would be identical:
>
> {aa, bb, cc}.ptsa  (* expression 1 *)
> ptsa.{aa, bb, cc}  (* expression 2 *)
>
> but they are not. They evaluate respectively as:
>
> {aa x1 + bb x2 + cc x3, aa y1 + bb y2 + cc y3,
> aa z1 + bb z2 + cc z3}
>
> {aa x1 + bb y1 + cc z1, aa x2 + bb y2 + cc z2,
>   aa x3 + bb y3 + cc z3}
>
> Since ptsa is itself three xyz coordinates, the expressions might be
> ambiguous, but I assumed the dot product would always commute. Should
> there be a warning?
>
> The first result is the one I want.
>
> Steve Gray
>
>
>  



  • Prev by Date: Wrong result for definite integral
  • Next by Date: Re: Just some thousands of combinations...
  • Previous by thread: Re: Dot product confusion
  • Next by thread: Re: Dot product confusion