MathGroup Archive 2010

[Date Index] [Thread Index] [Author Index]

Search the Archive

Re: It would be nice to have DiagonalMatrix accept a matrix as building

  • To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
  • Subject: [mg113535] Re: It would be nice to have DiagonalMatrix accept a matrix as building
  • From: Patrick Scheibe <pscheibe at trm.uni-leipzig.de>
  • Date: Mon, 1 Nov 2010 05:02:15 -0500 (EST)

Hi,

aehmm, what about

SparseArray[Band[{1, 1}] -> {b,b,b,b,b,b}]

where b={{1, 2}, {3, 4}}?
Takes me about 5 seconds to type. So why care that DiagonalMatrix
can't do it?

Cheers
Patrick



On Sun, 2010-10-31 at 04:18 -0500, Nasser M. Abbasi wrote:
> Sometime there is a need to make a matrix with repeating subblocks on 
> the diagonal.  For example, one might want to create matrix A, with 
> matrix B on its diagonal, repeated n times.
> 
> DiagonalMatrix only accepts vector (list), not matrix (list of lists), 
> as its argument.
> 
> So, one has the option to use DiagonalMatrix, repeatedly, using 
> different offsets at a time, and manually layout the diagonal. Or use 
> SparseArray since SparseArray accepts a matrix as the band, but also 
> make a loop to add the block at different locations on the diagonal.
> 
> The SparseArray method is little less work, but I think a nice solution 
> would be to have the ability to specify the block, and how many time it 
> needs to be repeated on the diagonal. That other 'system' has this 
> command to do that.
> 
> This is how I now create a diagonalMatrix with matrices at its diagonal. 
> Maybe an expert here knows of a short way or trick to use.
> 
> In this example, I wanted to make matrix 'a' with the submatrix
> 
>              {{1,2}{3,4}}
> 
> on its diagonal, and wanted this repeated 6 times. So, I made a large 
> cup of coffee, sat down and wrote this
> 
> ----------------------------
> block={{1,2},{3,4}};
> sizeOfBlock=Length[block];
> nBlocks=6;
> a=Table[0,{i,sizeOfBlock*nBlocks},{j,sizeOfBlock*nBlocks}];
> Do[
> a=a+Normal@SparseArray[Band[{i*sizeOfBlock+1,i*sizeOfBlock+1}]->block,nBlocks*sizeOfBlock],
> {i,0,nBlocks-1}
> ];
> --------------------------
> 
> {{1,2,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0},{3,4,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0},
> {0,0,1,2,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0},{0,0,3,4,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0},
> {0,0,0,0,1,2,0,0,0,0,0,0},{0,0,0,0,3,4,0,0,0,0,0,0},
> {0,0,0,0,0,0,1,2,0,0,0,0},{0,0,0,0,0,0,3,4,0,0,0,0},
> {0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,2,0,0},{0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,3,4,0,0},
> {0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,2},{0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,3,4}}
> 
> So, it works.
> 
> But if what I had imagined existed, I should have been able to do
> 
> DiagonalMatrix[block,0,6]
> 
> Again, the above command would only work if 'block' was a 1-D list, not 
> a 2-D list (ie. a matrix).
> 
> of course, I can make a function and hide the code I wrote inside this 
> function, and it would just look the same as the call that I wanted.
> 
> All what I am saying is that Mathematica should support this feature as 
> part of DiagonalMatrix as it is very common thing.
> 
> thanks
> --Nasser
> 
> 
> 



  • Prev by Date: Re: It would be nice to have DiagonalMatrix accept a matrix as building
  • Next by Date: Re: how to plot nminimized result
  • Previous by thread: Re: It would be nice to have DiagonalMatrix accept a matrix as building
  • Next by thread: Re: It would be nice to have DiagonalMatrix accept a matrix as building