MathGroup Archive 2010

[Date Index] [Thread Index] [Author Index]

Search the Archive

Question about Mathematica benchmark

  • To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
  • Subject: [mg113567] Question about Mathematica benchmark
  • From: pratip <pratip.chakraborty at gmail.com>
  • Date: Tue, 2 Nov 2010 05:04:57 -0500 (EST)

Dear Group,

Here is my benchmark result. Can anybody tell me if there is anything
wrong with test nr. 9 (matrix multiplication). The reference linux
result for a older processor is two times faster than my result. Is it
because of Windows OS? Or I can do something more to get a better
timing for test 9.

Any suggestion?


=== System Information ===

Machine Name:          my-pc
System:                Microsoft Windows (64-bit)
Date:                  November 1, 2010
Mathematica Version:   7.0.1
Benchmark Result:      7.03


=== MathematicaMark7 System Comparison ===

my-pc                  7.03
Microsoft Windows (64-bit)

2.40 GHz Intel Core2 Q6660      3.91
Microsoft Windows (64-bit)

2.33 GHz Intel Xeon E5410       3.78
Microsoft Windows (64-bit)

2.50 GHz Intel Xeon E5420       3.75
Linux x86 (64-bit)

3.0 GHz Intel Xeon 5160         2.84
Microsoft Windows (32-bit)

2.66 GHz Intel Xeon             2.14
Apple Mac OS 10.4.8 (64-bit)

1.6 GHz Intel Xeon 5310         1.88
CentOS Linux 4.4 (32-bit)

1.4 GHz Itanium 2               1.78
Red Hat Linux AS 3.0 (64-bit)

2.4 GHz Opteron 250             1.24
Sun Solaris 10 (64-bit)

2.5 GHz G5                      1.22
Apple Mac OS 10.4.8 (32-bit)

2.4 GHz Pentium 4               1.00
Microsoft Windows XP (32-bit)

(Faster systems give larger numbers)


=== MathematicaMark7 Detailed Timings ===

                               Total  Test 1  Test 2  Test 3  Test 4
Test 5  Test 6  Test 7  Test 8  Test 9  Test 10  Test 11  Test 12
Test 13  Test 14  Test 15

my-pc
Microsoft Windows (64-bit)     12.3   0.80    0.30    0.36    0.88
0.80    0.19    0.41    1.45    1.15    0.66     1.56     0.94
0.96     0.81     1.00

2.40 GHz Intel Core2 Q6660
Microsoft Windows (64-bit)     22.1   1.11    0.50    0.73    1.59
1.59    0.31    0.70    2.82    1.30    1.68     2.81     2.23
1.77     1.33     1.60

2.33 GHz Intel Xeon E5410
Microsoft Windows (64-bit)     22.8   1.09    0.52    0.76    1.65
3.01    0.31    0.70    2.84    1.06    1.64     2.79     1.83
1.75     1.23     1.59

2.50 GHz Intel Xeon E5420
Linux x86 (64-bit)             23.0   1.21    0.57    0.80    1.45
4.30    0.43    0.84    2.27    0.66    1.91     2.34     1.73
1.52     1.41     1.56

3.0 GHz Intel Xeon 5160
Microsoft Windows (32-bit)     30.4   2.08    0.67    1.09    2.70
4.03    0.50    0.89    3.17    2.00    2.16     2.41     2.08
1.50     2.59     2.52

2.66 GHz Intel Xeon
Apple Mac OS 10.4.8 (64-bit)   40.3   1.75    0.44    1.85    3.38
11.70   0.30    0.52    3.62    2.07    2.39     2.41     1.56
1.71     3.66     2.91

1.6 GHz Intel Xeon 5310
CentOS Linux 4.4 (32-bit)      45.8   2.01    1.20    0.93    4.42
8.32    0.88    1.54    5.12    1.61    3.14     3.91     2.73
3.37     3.49     3.12

1.4 GHz Itanium 2
Red Hat Linux AS 3.0 (64-bit)  48.6   3.82    0.83    1.39    1.92
2.80    0.33    0.76    7.44    3.29    4.84     7.11     4.90
2.90     2.88     3.34

2.4 GHz Opteron 250
Sun Solaris 10 (64-bit)        69.3   3.92    0.60    3.68    5.79
15.30   0.41    0.90    7.62    4.32    3.31     4.27     3.52
5.68     4.53     5.45

2.5 GHz G5
Apple Mac OS 10.4.8 (32-bit)   70.6   3.92    1.25    3.88    4.53
18.10   0.81    1.43    6.39    2.29    4.96     5.83     4.64
2.72     6.02     3.89

2.4 GHz Pentium 4
Microsoft Windows XP (32-bit)  86.2   5.05    1.23    3.00    8.84
7.50    0.92    1.63    9.17    8.78    5.39     6.17     5.67
4.51     9.42     8.90

(Timings are CPU time in seconds)


  • Prev by Date: Re: Assertions in Mathematica?
  • Next by Date: Re: Balance point of a solid
  • Previous by thread: Re: is there an 'issue' with putting Notation[] command inside a Module[]?
  • Next by thread: Locator options in Manipulate