MathGroup Archive 2010

[Date Index] [Thread Index] [Author Index]

Search the Archive

Re: Balance point of a solid

  • To: mathgroup at
  • Subject: [mg113781] Re: Balance point of a solid
  • From: Ray Koopman <koopman at>
  • Date: Fri, 12 Nov 2010 05:27:50 -0500 (EST)
  • References: <iam332$jvn$> <ibgj10$ec3$>

On Nov 11, 3:11 am, Andreas <aa... at> wrote:
> Daniel, Ray, Clifford -- Many thanks for the thought provoking
> contributions.
> Ray and others have found using integration on this problem takes
> inordinately long to calculate once you get to 5 dimensions.
> Could one attack this problem in another way?  It occurred to me
> that given that we know the lengths of the base simplex and heights
> of the trapezoids as well as the right angles of the heights to the
> base simplex one could then calculate the length of the top lines and
> solve the entire thing geometrically without needing to integrate.
> Not necessarily pretty or elegant but it might give give a solution
> that calculates fast.
> Anyone think this could work?

The solution I found, rewritten here in the notation of my Nov 5
post as  ((h/Tr@h + 1)/(1 + Length@h)).A ,  is fast and agrees
with the results given by integrating. What's missing is a proof.

  • Prev by Date: Constructing matrix out of submatrices
  • Next by Date: Re: 2-D Fourier Transform?
  • Previous by thread: Re: Balance point of a solid
  • Next by thread: Re: Balance point of a solid