Mathematica 9 is now available
Services & Resources / Wolfram Forums / MathGroup Archive
-----

MathGroup Archive 2010

[Date Index] [Thread Index] [Author Index]

Search the Archive

Re: Using MapAt with Play

  • To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
  • Subject: [mg113899] Re: Using MapAt with Play
  • From: Albert Retey <awnl at gmx-topmail.de>
  • Date: Wed, 17 Nov 2010 05:31:05 -0500 (EST)
  • References: <ibr391$8vi$1@smc.vnet.net> <ibtku8$5gt$1@smc.vnet.net> <ibtp28$8ni$1@smc.vnet.net>

Am 16.11.2010 12:14, schrieb BenT:
> On Nov 16, 4:03 am, Albert Retey <a... at gmx-topmail.de> wrote:
>> Am 15.11.2010 11:50, schrieb BenT:
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>> Using Mathematica 7, please consider this code:
>>
>>> Play[{Sin[440 t 2 Pi], Sin[441 t 2 Pi]}, {t, 0, 1},
>>>  SampleRate -> 44100, SampleDepth -> 16]
>>
>>> which works as intended.
>>
>>> But now attempting to use the MapAt function,
>>
>>> p = {440, 550, 660, 770, 880};
>>> Play[{Sin[# t 2 Pi], Sin[(# + 1) t 2 Pi] &} /@ p, {t, 0, 1},
>>>  SampleRate -> 44100, SampleDepth -> 16]
>>
>>> I get the following error coding:
>>
>>> During evaluation of In[28]:= Sound::ssnm: A good PlayRange could not
>>> be found since most of the samples are not evaluating to machine-size
>>> real numbers. >>
>>
>>> Out[28]= Sound[
>>>  SampledSoundFunction[
>>>   Function[{Play`Time37},
>>>    Block[{t =
>>>       0. + 0.0000226757 Play`Time37}, ({Sin[#1 t 2 \[Pi]],
>>>          Sin[(#1 + 1) t 2 \[Pi]] &} /@ p + 0.) 1.]],
>>>   44100, {44100, 16}]]
>>
>>> Can anyone tell me how to "correct" the problem? The intent is to
>>> "automate" the playback of several "paired" pitches.
>>
>> There seem to be three problems with your code:
>> 1) the pure function termination is at the wrong place
>> 2) Play doesn't like the list of list, so I Flatten the resulting list
>> of lists
>> 3) Play has attribute HoldAll, so we need to Evaluate to enforce the
>> evaluation.
>>
>> Honestly my impression is that Play has some problems handling input
>> that it doesn't accept, my Kernel died a few times when experimenting
>> with it...
>>
>> The follwing works, although I doubt it does what you intended (it plays
>> on 10 channels.):
>>
>> p = {440, 550, 660, 770, 880};
>>
>> Play[
>>  Evaluate[Flatten[{Sin[# t 2 Pi], Sin[(# + 1) t 2 Pi]} & /@ p]],
>>  {t, 0, 1}, SampleRate -> 44100, SampleDepth -> 16
>>  ]
>>
>> Maybe this is closer to what you want? It adds up the signals instead of
>> playing them on different channels...
>>
>> Play[
>>  Evaluate[
>>   Plus @@ Flatten[{Sin[# t 2 Pi], Sin[(# + 1) t 2 Pi]} & /@ p]],
>>  {t, 0, 1}, SampleRate -> 44100, SampleDepth -> 16
>>  ]
>>
>> hth,
>>
>> albert- Hide quoted text -
>>
>> - Show quoted text -
> 
> No, I want consecutive note playback for one second _each_, not
> simulataneous. The use of two of more channels is not important.
> Summing works fine, as the effect I want is an example of chorusing.
> For example (although this code _still_ doesn't work!):
> 
> p = {440, 550, 660, 770, 880};
> Play[{N[Sin[# t 2 Pi] + Sin[(# + 1) t 2 Pi]]} & /@ p, {t, 0, 1},
>  SampleRate -> 44100, SampleDepth -> 16]
> 
> I'm (still) getting the error:
> 
> Sound::ssnm: A good PlayRange could not be found since most of the
> samples are not evaluating to machine-size real numbers. >>
> 
> What can be done to correct this?

I'm still not sure if I understood correctly what you try to achieve,
but here is another try:

notes = {440, 550, 440, 770, 660};

Show[Map[Play[#, {t, 0, 0.5}] &,
  Plus[N[Sin[# t 2 Pi] + Sin[(# + 300) t 2 Pi]]] & /@ notes]]

this makes use of the fact that a Show of a list of Plays obviously
joins them to one Sound object. I have also increased the difference of
the two frequencies, otherwise you will only see a beat effect but not
something that sounds like two voices.

The code above works on my machine, but honestly, I would be
disappointed by that chorus :-)

hth,

albert


  • Prev by Date: Re: reading different locations of a matrix specified
  • Next by Date: Re: Mathematica 8 is now available
  • Previous by thread: Re: Using MapAt with Play
  • Next by thread: FoldList for decaying local maximum?