MathGroup Archive 2010

[Date Index] [Thread Index] [Author Index]

Search the Archive

Re: Mathematica 8

  • To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
  • Subject: [mg114092] Re: Mathematica 8
  • From: Curtis Osterhoudt <cfo at lanl.gov>
  • Date: Tue, 23 Nov 2010 06:00:11 -0500 (EST)

Hi, Jake, 

   I don't mind at all.
   I think I have 4 GiB of RAM in my Lenovo laptops, dual core, but I don't have a 64 bit processor (only 32). I suspect, though (only suspect!) that things will run very well in your setup, as long as you don't have to do REALLY memory-intensive calculations.

                       Best wishes!
                           Curtis



On Monday, November 22, 2010 14:53:17 J and B wrote:
> Thanks Curtis for the answering my question.  One more if you don't mind.
> With my IBM I only had 512 ram, in my Lenovo I have 4 gig, and duel core, 64
> bit.  With this be ok with a lap top using the new Mathematica?
> 
> Thanks once again and Happy Thanksgiving
> Jake 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Curtis Osterhoudt [mailto:cfo at lanl.gov] 
> Sent: Monday, November 22, 2010 1:11 PM
> To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
> Cc: J and B
> Subject: Re: [mg114047] Re: Mathematica 8
> 
> No troubles.
> 
> The laptop is a Lenovo ThinkPad T500 (they're no longer produced, having
> been superceded by the T510). They have an integrated Intel graphics chip,
> and also a discrete ATI graphics card (one can force switches between these
> in the BIOS, and also linux and Windows allow switching within the OS,
> though I haven't tried that). 
> 
> They're good laptops; I've run pretty intensive things on them both in
> Windows XP and linux, though I tend to boot only into linux, and run
> Mathematica 8 (and 7 and 6) on the linux partitions, so I'm not 100% sure
> how M version 8 will behave in Windows (I do have a home-built desktop
> running Windows 7 and Mathematica 8 works fine). 
> 
>         Hope that helps a little, 
>                                    Curtis
> 
> 
> 
> On Monday, November 22, 2010 11:04:54 J and B wrote:
> > Sorry to butt in, but I noticed that you have an Lenovo laptop.  I am 
> > getting one, but I don't know what I need in order to run M8 on it.  I 
> > will be using going version of windows on it.
> > 
> > I had to get another desktop 3 years ago, an Lenovo just to run version 7.
> > My IBM desktop could not handle M7. 
> > 
> > Thanks
> > 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Curtis F. Osterhoudt [mailto:cfo at lanl.gov]
> > Sent: Monday, November 22, 2010 7:36 AM
> > To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
> > Subject: [mg114047] Re: Mathematica 8
> > 
> > Interesting. I decided to play with this too (on a Lenovo notebook 
> > with two cores, running a 32-bit linux). If I choose to have 
> > Mathematica fire up another kernel "as needed", things run fine. 
> > However, if I ask it to start two kernels "on startup", the Benchmark 
> > runs for a long time (I haven't let it complete yet) and pegs both 
> > cores at around 100%. It also prints no output. Perhaps a bug?
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > >> Could you elaborate a bit on this? I thought to make use of more 
> > >> than one core I needed to use commands like Parallelize. Are 
> > >> modifying the benchmarking code?
> > >
> > > No ... I just selected to launch parallel kernels on startup of 
> > > Mathematica 8 in Mathematica Preferences.
> > >
> > > Then I just ran MathematicaMark8 with no code modifications to see 
> > > what happened.
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> 
> 
> --
> ==================================
> Curtis Osterhoudt
> cfo at remove_this.lanl.and_this.gov
> ==================================
> 
> 


-- 
==================================
Curtis Osterhoudt
cfo at remove_this.lanl.and_this.gov
==================================


  • Prev by Date: Re: Need help NIntegrating stepwise 3D probability density functions
  • Next by Date: Re: How to adjust selection w/ arrow keys?, etc.
  • Previous by thread: Re: Mathematica 8
  • Next by thread: sieving out selected multiples