[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
[Author Index]
Re: Mathematica and infinite series
*To*: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
*Subject*: [mg113200] Re: Mathematica and infinite series
*From*: Sam Takoy <sam.takoy at yahoo.com>
*Date*: Mon, 18 Oct 2010 05:48:09 -0400 (EDT)
Hi,
Thanks for the response!
I don't have Mathematica on the computer on which I'm typing this email, so I'm
not able to reformulate my question reliably.
I was hoping to come up with a series that does not have a closed form
analytical expression. I was hoping that Mathematica would be able to treat
SeriesCoefficient and an inverse to an infinite Sum. How about (hoping it's
"safe" from Mathematica's analytical ability):
f[x_] := Sum[BesselJZero[0, n^2] Sin[n^2] Log[Sin[Cos[n]]]Log[n]/(n^2
Factorial[n]) x^n, {n, 1, Infinity}]
Assuming[n > 0, SeriesCoefficient[f[x], {x, 0, n}]]
Thanks again,
Sam
________________________________
From: Andrzej Kozlowski <akoz at mimuw.edu.pl>
To: Sam Takoy <sam.takoy at yahoo.com>
Sent: Sun, October 17, 2010 12:05:30 PM
Subject: [mg113200] Re: [mg113185] Mathematica and infinite series
The problem is that Mathematica seems to go crazy when asked to evaluate:
Sum[(Log[n]/(n^2*n!))*x^n, {n, 1, Infinity}]
E^x*Derivative[1, 0][BellB][-2, x]
The answer is given in terms of the derivative of the function BellB[n,x] with
respect to the first variable at {-2,x}. But, and this is weird, since Bell[n,x]
is the n-th Bell polynomial so n must be a non-negative integer:
In[4]:= BellB[-1,2]
During evaluation of In[4]:= BellB::intnm: Non-negative machine-size integer
expected at position 1 in Subscript[B, -1](2). >>
See also here : http://mathworld.wolfram.com/BellPolynomial.html
Really weird.
Andrzej Kozlowski
On 17 Oct 2010, at 12:06, Sam Takoy wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am about to embark on a project that operates heavily in infinite
> series, so I started figuring out Mathematica's basis capabilities. I
> found them very impressive, but I came across this:
>
>
> f[x_] := Sum[Log[n]/(n^2 Factorial[n]) x^n, {n, 1, Infinity}]
> Assuming[n > 0, SeriesCoefficient[f[x], {x, 0, 4}]]
>
>
> Answer:
>
> SeriesCoefficient[\!\(
> \*UnderoverscriptBox[\(\[Sum]\), \(n = 1\), \(\[Infinity]\)]
> \*FractionBox[\(
> \*SuperscriptBox[\(x\), \(n\)]\ Log[n]\), \(
> \*SuperscriptBox[\(n\), \(2\)]\ \(n!\)\)]\), {x, 0, 4}]
>
>
> Why doesn't Mathematica produce Log[n]/(n^2 Factorial[n]) as the answer?
>
> Thanks!
>
> Sam
>
Prev by Date:
**Re: evaluation of a non-visible dynamic[]**
Next by Date:
**Re: Mathematica and infinite series**
Previous by thread:
**Re: Mathematica and infinite series**
Next by thread:
**Re: Mathematica and infinite series**
| |