[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
[Author Index]
Re: Generalizing Complement to handle multiple occurrences
*To*: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
*Subject*: [mg112480] Re: Generalizing Complement to handle multiple occurrences
*From*: Leonid Shifrin <lshifr at gmail.com>
*Date*: Fri, 17 Sep 2010 06:39:49 -0400 (EDT)
Christoph,
This is only so because your ranges for random integers are so much smaller
than the number
of generated integers. After Union in your code is done, you are left with
at most 41 numbers,
which is a small enough list so that Alternatives can do a pretty good job
to hide the true
Length[a]*Length[b] complexity of this approach. Try this:
a = RandomInteger[{1, 100000}, 1000000];
b = RandomInteger[{30, 70000}, 1000000];
I was not patient enough to see it finished. Of course, that matters mostly
for the second list,
in this method.
Regards,
Leonid
On Thu, Sep 16, 2010 at 1:58 PM, Christoph Lhotka <
christoph.lhotka at univie.ac.at> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> for 1 000 000 random elements on my computer a factor 3 slower than the
> built in Complement function:
>
> a = RandomInteger[{1, 100}, 1000000];
> b = RandomInteger[{30, 70}, 1000000];
>
> DeleteCases[a, Alternatives@@Union[b]]
>
> Ciao,
>
> Christoph
>
> On 15/09/2010 10:38, Mark Coleman wrote:
> > Greetings,
> >
> > I'm wondering how one can efficiently generalize the built-in
> > Complement function to return multiple occurrences of elements. For
> > instance, the current version generates
> >
> > a={1,2,2,3,4,4,4,4}
> > b={3,5,7}
> >
> > Complement[a,b]={1,2,4}
> >
> > I'm looking for a way to define
> >
> > myComplement[a,b]={1,2,2,4,4,4,4}
> >
> > My current code is very inefficient!
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Mark
> >
> >
> >
Prev by Date:
**Re: Extracting some elements, members of another list**
Next by Date:
**Re: Inconsistent behaviour of Integrate**
Previous by thread:
**Re: Generalizing Complement to handle multiple occurrences**
Next by thread:
**Plotting Quartic Solutions in Polar Coordinates**
| |