MathGroup Archive 2011

[Date Index] [Thread Index] [Author Index]

Search the Archive

Re: why extending numbers by zeros instead of dropping precision is a good idea

  • To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
  • Subject: [mg117914] Re: why extending numbers by zeros instead of dropping precision is a good idea
  • From: Noqsi <noqsiaerospace at gmail.com>
  • Date: Mon, 4 Apr 2011 06:30:10 -0400 (EDT)

On Mar 31, 3:06 am, Richard Fateman <fate... at eecs.berkeley.edu> wrote:
> It is occasionally stated that subtracting nearly equal quantities from
> each other is a bad idea and somehow unstable or results in noise. (JT
> Sardus said it on 3/29/2011, for example.)
>
>   This is not always true; in fact it may be true hardly ever.

Hardly ever? What a silly assertion. This has been a major concern
since the dawn of automatic numerical analysis.

>
>   It is, for example, the essence of Newton iteration.

Convergence on a fixed point is a special case. Negative feedback
attenuates error (your homework today is to study how the delta-sigma
method can extract 24 bit accuracy from a 1 bit digitizer). But many
numerical methods lack negative feedback.


  • Prev by Date: FinancialData[], German index "DAX", "FinancialData::notent:"
  • Next by Date: PlotLegend and Show
  • Previous by thread: Re: why extending numbers by zeros instead of dropping precision is a good idea
  • Next by thread: Re: why extending numbers by zeros instead of dropping precision is a good idea