Re: NIntegrate with AdaptiveMonteCarlo gives different results
- To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
- Subject: [mg123335] Re: NIntegrate with AdaptiveMonteCarlo gives different results
- From: DrMajorBob <btreat1 at austin.rr.com>
- Date: Fri, 2 Dec 2011 07:20:07 -0500 (EST)
- Delivered-to: l-mathgroup@mail-archive0.wolfram.com
That's meaningless without definitions for "R", "hc", "compnx", "cmpny", and "cmpnz". Bobby On Thu, 01 Dec 2011 07:03:37 -0600, valentina <fuchi8 at tiscali.it> wrote: > Hello everybody, > I am dealing with a three dimensional integral and I am using > NIntegrate. Searching the web I found out that the best method is the > AdaptiveMonteCarlo, which also speed up the calculation. > this is the integral, no particular singular points: > > > test[d_] := (0.5 NIntegrate[(compnx[x, y, z, d] + > compny[x, y, z, d] + compnz[x, y, z, d]), {z, -R - d/2, > R + d/2}, {x, -R, R}, {y, -R, R}, > Method -> "MultiDimensionalRule"]*hc) // Timing > > so I want to calculate it for different values of the parameter d, but > for example if I successively calculate it for d=4 i get two different > results which differs of about 30-50 MeV. > > Does anyone know if it is a bug or how could I fix it? > > Thanks in advance. > -- DrMajorBob at yahoo.com