|
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
[Author Index]
Re: Another point about Mathematica 8.0
- To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
- Subject: [mg116527] Re: Another point about Mathematica 8.0
- From: "Kevin J. McCann" <Kevin.McCann at umbc.edu>
- Date: Fri, 18 Feb 2011 04:35:45 -0500 (EST)
- References: <ijisqf$2ej$1@smc.vnet.net>
I believe that was his really long 10th anniversary speech, and I recall
that he did say that it was the only time the company lost significant
money after the initial startup.
Kevin
On 2/17/2011 5:21 AM, Murray Eisenberg wrote:
> I vaguely recall the following, paraphrased, statement by Stephen
> Wolfram at one of the conferences his company organized. At one point,
> he brought in business people to run the business aspect of the company,
> and it was a big mistake. (He may even have said that was the only time
> the company didn't make a profit; that's the part I don't recall at all
> precisely.)
>
> On 2/16/2011 4:34 AM, AES wrote:
>>
>> 3) I don't think Wolfram is much interested in what my business model
>> for Mathematica would be (and that might be good judgement on their
>> part!). But if they asked, I'd say that I'd like a tiered or modular
>> (or whatever you want to call it) approach where increasing more capable
>> versions of Mathematica were available at increasing price points --
>> just like most every other product in the marketplace.
>
Prev by Date:
Re: get rid of I in the result of an integral
Next by Date:
problem with NDSolve::dvnoarg:
Previous by thread:
Re: Another point about Mathematica 8.0
Next by thread:
Re: Another point about Mathematica 8.0
|