[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
[Author Index]
Re: Solve can solve it with some help
*To*: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
*Subject*: [mg115384] Re: Solve can solve it with some help
*From*: Peter Pein <petsie at dordos.net>
*Date*: Mon, 10 Jan 2011 02:34:03 -0500 (EST)
*References*: <igbnk8$hj9$1@smc.vnet.net>
On 09.01.2011 08:20, Eduardo Cavazos wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Solve doesn't come up with anything for these two equations:
>
> {
> 0 == 1/2*m*vf^2 + 0 - m*g*(R - R*Cos[\[Theta]]),
>
> m*vf^2/R == m*g*Cos[\[Theta]]
> };
> Solve[%, \[Theta]]
>
> If you manually solve one of them for vf, Solve can take care of the
> rest:
>
> 0 == 1/2*m*vf^2 + 0 - m*g*(R - R*Cos[\[Theta]]);
> % /. Solve[m*vf^2/R == m*g*Cos[\[Theta]], vf][[2]];
> Solve[%, \[Theta]]
>
> {{\[Theta] -> -ArcCos[2/3]}, {\[Theta] -> ArcCos[2/3]}}
>
> Of course, Reduce can handle the original set. However, Solve is nice
> due to the brevity of output. (Side question: is there a way to extract
> an equation from the results of Reduce based on variable name? Sometimes
> the results from Reduce can be so verbose, it'd be nice to say "extract
> equation for theta".)
>
> My main question: is there a way to get Solve to solve the original set
> of two equations without taking the manual approach?
>
> Ed
>
>
Hi Ed,
to extract a list of rules from a result returned by Reduce, I sometimes
use:
ReduceToRules[red_, var_] :=
Cases[LogicalExpand[red] /. And | Or -> List,
{___, HoldPattern[Equal[var, val_] | Equal[val_, var]], ___} :>
{Rule[var, val]}, 1] // Union
which returns in your example
{{\[Theta] -> -ArcCos[2/3] + 2 \[Pi] C[1]},
{\[Theta] -> ArcCos[2/3] + 2 \[Pi] C[1]}}
Peter
Prev by Date:
**Re: How do I do very big integer computing by Mathematica?**
Next by Date:
**Re: Summed Area Table / Integral Image**
Previous by thread:
**Solve can solve it with some help**
Next by thread:
**Re: Solve can solve it with some help**
| |