Services & Resources / Wolfram Forums / MathGroup Archive
-----

MathGroup Archive 2011

[Date Index] [Thread Index] [Author Index]

Search the Archive

Re: Mathematica 20x slower than Java at arithmetic/special functions, is

  • To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
  • Subject: [mg115890] Re: Mathematica 20x slower than Java at arithmetic/special functions, is
  • From: "Sjoerd C. de Vries" <sjoerd.c.devries at gmail.com>
  • Date: Mon, 24 Jan 2011 05:56:45 -0500 (EST)
  • References: <ihiab8$m3b$1@smc.vnet.net>

Using Mathematica's Compile your function can be speeded up by a
factor of about 7. Still a factor of 3 to explain...

How did you do the timing BTW?


Cheers -- Sjoerd


On Jan 23, 11:33 pm, Leo Alekseyev <dnqu... at gmail.com> wrote:
> I was playing around with JLink the other day, and noticed that Java
> seems to outperform Mathematica by ~20x  in an area where I'd expect
> Mathematica to be rather well optimized -- arithmetic involving special
> functions.  In my particular example, I am simply evaluating a sum of
> Bessel functions.  I understand that much depends on the underlying
> implementation, but I just want to run this by Mathgroup to see if
> this is to be expected, or maybe if I'm doing something suboptimal in
> Mathematica.  Here's the code that I'm running:
>
> grid1dc[x_,
>   y_] = (With[{d = 0.1, NN = 50},
>     Sum[Re[N[
>         d BesselJ[1, 2 Pi d Sqrt[m^2 + n^2]]/
>           Sqrt[m^2 + n^2 + 10^-7]] Exp[
>         I 2.0 Pi (m x + n y)]], {m, -NN, NN, 1}, {n, -NN, NN, 1}]=
]) //
>    N
>
> and
>
> gridres1da =
>  With[{delta = 0.5, xlim = 2.5, ylim = 2.5},
>   Table[{x, y, grid1dc[x, y]}, {x, -xlim, xlim, delta}, {y, -ylim,
>     ylim, delta}]]
>
> Java implementation uses Colt and Apache common math libraries for the
> Bessels and complex numbers, uses a double for loop, and consistently
> runs 15-20 times faster.
>
> --Leo



  • Prev by Date: Re: Do I need MathLink to run finite-difference fast enough for
  • Next by Date: Re: Mathematica 20x slower than Java at arithmetic/special functions, is
  • Previous by thread: Re: Mathematica 20x slower than Java at arithmetic/special functions, is
  • Next by thread: Re: Mathematica 20x slower than Java at arithmetic/special functions, is