MathGroup Archive 2011

[Date Index] [Thread Index] [Author Index]

Search the Archive

Re: How to write a "proper" math document

Richard Fateman wrote

> While I agree that Mathematica could be improved, I think it is pretty
> speculative to say that it would be better if  Mathematica were free and
> open source. I'm in favor of paying programmers and mathematicians.  I
> doubt that you get the best results from students who have to deliver
> pizzas in the evenings to pay their rent.

I can see your point here, but I believe the biggest advantage of free
software (as in free speech) is that everyone who _needs_ an
improvement _for him/herself_ is free, if he or she is able, to develop
and add the code that make an application better or more useful.
It does not take anything away from you: if you are able and willing to
perfectionate the code to suit your own purpose, you are free to do it.
If you have the money to pay someone who can do that for you, you can
let them do it (in this way they could quit that pizza delivering job).

With closed source software you are only free to beg the source owner
to do that for you, possibly for a fee (or the cost of an upgrade). And
if he/she does not feel like doing it, you're stuck. I guess there are
a  'long liver' bugs in Mathematica, too.

Perhaps complex software must reach a critical mass before going open
and free. In this way the original developer can be rewarded for their
skills and dedication during the commercial phase. From the 'now it's
free' point on, the software can benefit from the contributes of the
skilled users. I guess that's what happens when patents expire.


  • Prev by Date: Re: How to NSolve equation which involves NIntegrate?
  • Next by Date: Re: Grouping terms under the radical
  • Previous by thread: Re: How to write a "proper" math document
  • Next by thread: Re: How to write a "proper" math document