[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
[Author Index]
Re: Incredible slow Plot
*To*: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
*Subject*: [mg120200] Re: Incredible slow Plot
*From*: DrMajorBob <btreat1 at austin.rr.com>
*Date*: Tue, 12 Jul 2011 07:01:13 -0400 (EDT)
*References*: <iv9etb$dg1$1@smc.vnet.net> <201107111058.GAA08408@smc.vnet.net>
*Reply-to*: drmajorbob at yahoo.com
> and that was it. However I don't understand this. Was the problem the
> "size" and "amount" of interpolated functions?
I don't understand it either. The two methods seem equivalent, but this
code
> sol=NDSolve[{eqns, cond},f,{t,0,1200}][[1]];
> a=sol[[1, Something, 2]]
> b=sol[[1, Something+1, 2]]
suggests that you're solving for one function f in the first line, and
YET, you're extracting two solutions a and b in the next two lines. That's
not possible, so you're not showing us the code you actually used. (We
know that anyway, since "eqns", "cond", and "Something" are undefined.)
I suspect in the real code, the two methods that seem equivalent are NOT
equivalent at all.
Bobby
On Mon, 11 Jul 2011 05:58:03 -0500, Iván Lazaro <gaminster at gmail.com>
wrote:
> Hi!
>
> Yes, I tried
>
> sol=NDSolve[{eqns, cond},f,{t,0,1200}][[1]];
> Plot[Evaluate[f[t]/.sol],{t,0,1200}],
>
> but that was a pain. Thanks to Bobby I managed to solve my speed problem:
>
> Instead of
>
> sol=NDSolve[{eqns, cond},f,{t,0,1200}][[1]];
> Plot[Evaluate[f[t]/.sol],{t,0,1200}],
>
> I selected the specific solutions I needed, and Set them to a variable
> that then I plot:
>
>
>
> sol=NDSolve[{eqns, cond},f,{t,0,1200}][[1]];
> a=sol[[1, Something, 2]]
> b=sol[[1, Something+1, 2]]
>
> Plot[{a[t],b[t]}],{t,0,1200}],
>
> and that was it. However I don't understand this. Was the problem the
> "size" and "amount" of interpolated functions?
>
--
DrMajorBob at yahoo.com
Prev by Date:
**Re: How to write a "proper" math document**
Next by Date:
**Re: Incredible slow Plot**
Previous by thread:
**Re: Incredible slow Plot**
Next by thread:
**Re: Incredible slow Plot**
| |