Re: Numerical accuracy/precision - this is a bug or a feature?
- To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
- Subject: [mg120225] Re: Numerical accuracy/precision - this is a bug or a feature?
- From: Richard Fateman <fateman at cs.berkeley.edu>
- Date: Thu, 14 Jul 2011 05:21:07 -0400 (EDT)
- References: <ius5op$2g7$1@smc.vnet.net> <ius7b6$30t$1@smc.vnet.net> <iv9ehj$dct$1@smc.vnet.net> <ivjgfp$2b9$1@smc.vnet.net>
On 7/13/2011 12:11 AM, Noqsi wrote: .. >> see e.g. >> <http://www.av8n.com/physics/uncertainty.htm>. > > .. Learning mathematics from a physicist is hazardous. Learning computer science from a physicist is hazardous too. Numbers in a computer are different from experimental measurements. nevertheless, I like this article. It says, among other things, The technique of propagating the uncertainty from step to step throughout the calculation is a very bad technique. It might sometimes work for super-simple ?textbook? problems but it is unlikely to work for real-world problems.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Numerical accuracy/precision - this is a bug or a feature?
- From: Andrzej Kozlowski <akoz@mimuw.edu.pl>
- Re: Numerical accuracy/precision - this is a bug or a feature?
- From: "W. Craig Carter" <ccarter@mit.edu>
- Re: Numerical accuracy/precision - this is a bug or a feature?