Services & Resources / Wolfram Forums / MathGroup Archive
-----

MathGroup Archive 2011

[Date Index] [Thread Index] [Author Index]

Search the Archive

Re: remarks on significance arithmetic implementation [Was: Re: Numerical accuracy/precision - this is a bug or a feature?]

  • To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
  • Subject: [mg120372] Re: remarks on significance arithmetic implementation [Was: Re: Numerical accuracy/precision - this is a bug or a feature?]
  • From: Richard Fateman <fateman at eecs.berkeley.edu>
  • Date: Wed, 20 Jul 2011 06:33:39 -0400 (EDT)

On 7/19/2011 6:49 PM, DrMajorBob wrote:
> As before, I think much of this discussion is useless. But this 
> example DOES give me pause:
>
>> Consider the two expressions
>> f[x_]:= (x-1)*(x+1)  and g[x_]:=(x^2-1)
>>
>> which are analytically the same function.
>>
>> given the value v=Interval[{-1/2,1/2}]    f[v] returns an interval with
>> width 2.  g[v] returns an interval with width 1/4.
>
> I don't see why we'd want significance tracking to act this way.
>
> Bobby
>
I think that it is considered too expensive to do it this way.
If you use significance arithmetic most of the time, it can't be
so expensive.

Also, it is difficult to write a program to do it, in general.

See
http://www.cs.berkeley.edu/~fateman/papers/interval.pdf

and look for SUE  or Single Use Expressions.

RJF



  • Prev by Date: Re: Using Plot3D; rotating the plot but, getting a different image after exporting.
  • Next by Date: Re: Replace, test question
  • Previous by thread: remarks on significance arithmetic implementation [Was: Re: Numerical accuracy/precision - this is a bug or a feature?]
  • Next by thread: Re: remarks on significance arithmetic implementation [Was: Re: Numerical accuracy/precision - this is a bug or a feature?]