       Re: Transforming an expression to publication form

• To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
• Subject: [mg120361] Re: Transforming an expression to publication form
• From: Andrzej Kozlowski <akoz at mimuw.edu.pl>
• Date: Wed, 20 Jul 2011 06:31:40 -0400 (EDT)
• References: <201107191057.GAA10297@smc.vnet.net>

```
On 19 Jul 2011, at 11:57, carlos at colorado.edu wrote:

> Suppose I have the expression
>
> C11=A*Em*(4-3*omega^2+nu*(-8+3*omega^2)+(-4+8*nu)*Cos[kappa]);
>
> I want to transform this into
>
> C11pub=Em*A*(4*(1-2*nu)*(1-Cos[kappa])-3*(1-nu)*omega^2);
>
> which is the exactly the way it has to appear in a journal
> publication,
> once mapped to LaTeX.  Both C11 and C11pub have the
> same LeafCount (27), and C11 is invariant under Simplify
> and FullSimplify.
>
> How do I accomplish  C11 -> C11pub within Mathematica,
> without using any extra packages?  BTW this is part of one
> of 36 matrix entries, so transforming all by hand takes a while.
>

On the one hand: in general, it is not reasonable to expect Mathematica
to do such things. It is not really intended for this purpose and while
one can often succeed by using special tricks, there is no general
approach and I don't think it is worth spending time on uncovering the
tricks needed in an individual case.

On the other hand, in this particular case it is rather easy to see
these "tricks".  Namely:

C11 = A*Em*(4 - 3*omega^2 +
nu*(-8 + 3*omega^2) + (-4 + 8*nu)*Cos[kappa])

Collect[Collect[C11, omega, Factor], {Em, A}]

A Em (4 (2 nu-1) (cos(kappa)-1)+3 (nu-1) omega^2)

This is essentially your C11pub except for some signs in a few places.

Andrzej Kozlowski

```

• Prev by Date: Possible Bug in Dates Supplied with FinancialData Function
• Next by Date: Re: numeric Groebner bases et al [Was Re: Numerical accuracy/precision - this is a bug or a feature?]
• Previous by thread: Transforming an expression to publication form
• Next by thread: Re: Transforming an expression to publication form