MathGroup Archive 2011

[Date Index] [Thread Index] [Author Index]

Search the Archive

Re: symbolic integration of wave functions

  • To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
  • Subject: [mg117018] Re: symbolic integration of wave functions
  • From: "Sjoerd C. de Vries" <sjoerd.c.devries at gmail.com>
  • Date: Tue, 8 Mar 2011 05:32:27 -0500 (EST)

Yep, I was a bit too fast there. Looks like a bug indeed.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Achilleas Lazarides [mailto:achilleas.lazarides at gmx.com]
> Sent: Monday, 7 March 2011 12:44
> To: Sjoerd C. de Vries
> Cc: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
> Subject: Re: [mg116978] Re: symbolic integration of wave functions
> 
> No he is right, they should be the same. They are not here either (with
v8).
> 
> On Mar6, 2011, at 11:43 AM, Sjoerd C. de Vries wrote:
> 
> > Chris,
> >
> > A change of variables implies a change of boundary values...
> >
> > Cheers --  Sjoerd
> >
> > On Mar 5, 12:09 pm, chris pichon <c.n.c.pic... at gmail.com> wrote:
> >> Hello,
> >>
> >> Has anybody found the following problem with this integral in
Mathematica 8
> ?
> >>
> >> Integrate[ Sin[x] Exp[ I k  Cos[x - y]], {x,  0, 2 Pi}]
> >>
> >> which produces 0, which is incorrect as it should match
> >>
> >> Integrate[Sin[x + y] Exp[I k Cos[x]], {x, 0, 2 Pi}]
> >>
> >> 2 I Pi BesselJ[1, k] Sin[y]
> >>
> >> Cheers,
> >>
> >> Chris
> >
> >



  • Prev by Date: Re: Notebook interface and Wolfram-Alpha
  • Next by Date: two figures on same axes with different scales
  • Previous by thread: Re: symbolic integration of wave functions
  • Next by thread: Alternate Imaging Devices