Re: How to kill slave kernel securely?
- To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
- Subject: [mg117134] Re: How to kill slave kernel securely?
- From: "Alexey Popkov" <lehin.p at gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2011 06:12:04 -0500 (EST)
Instead of MemoryConstrained I would prefer to have 'FreeMemoryConstrained' function to protect from swapping securely... ----- Original Message ----- From: "Oliver Ruebenkoenig" <ruebenko at wolfram.com> To: "Alexey Popkov" <lehin.p at gmail.com> Cc: "comp.soft-sys.math.mathematica" <mathgroup at smc.vnet.net> Sent: Wednesday, March 09, 2011 9:46 PM Subject: [mg117134] Re: [mg117082] How to kill slave kernel securely? > On Wed, 9 Mar 2011, Alexey Popkov wrote: > > > Oliver, > > > > Is this a good way to do when the slave kernel freezes because of swapping? > > > > Alexey > > > > > > Alexey, > > You could try MemoryConstrained and use Quit for the failexpr. > > Oliver > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: "Oliver Ruebenkoenig" <ruebenko at wolfram.com> > > Newsgroups: wri.mathgroup > > To: "Alexey" <lehin.p at gmail.com> > > Cc: <mathgroup at smc.vnet.net> > > Sent: Wednesday, March 09, 2011 5:11 PM > > Subject: Re: [mg117082] How to kill slave kernel securely? > > > > > >> On Wed, 9 Mar 2011, Alexey wrote: > >> > >>> Good day, > >>> > >>> LinkClose[link] "does not necessarily terminate the program at the > >>> other end of the connection" as it is said in the Documentation. Is > >>> there a way to kill the process of the slave kernel securely? > >>> > >>> > >> > >> Alexey, > >> > >> you could use Quit. > >> > >> Oliver > >> > > >