MathGroup Archive 2011

[Date Index] [Thread Index] [Author Index]

Search the Archive

Re: $MaxNumber

  • To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
  • Subject: [mg117326] Re: $MaxNumber
  • From: Jason Ledbetter <jasonbrent at gmail.com>
  • Date: Tue, 15 Mar 2011 06:04:52 -0500 (EST)

In[2]:= $MaxNumber
Out[2]= 1.233433712981650*10^323228458
In[3]:= $Version
Out[3]= "8.0 for Mac OS X x86 (64-bit) (February 23, 2011)"


2010 macbook pro.



-jbl

On Mon, Mar 14, 2011 at 6:59 AM, John Fultz <jfultz at wolfram.com> wrote:

> Perhaps you have Home Edition of Mathematica.  Until the most recent
> release (8.0.1, released just a few days ago), Home Edition included only
> 32-bit versions of Mathematica.
>
> Sincerely,
>
> John Fultz
> jfultz at wolfram.com
> User Interface Group
> Wolfram Research, Inc.
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "a evans" <aeospam at gmail.com>
> > To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
> > Sent: Sunday, March 13, 2011 5:24:42 AM
> > Subject: [mg117253] $MaxNumber
> > I would be grateful if someone could help me to understand why my
> > $MaxNumber is seemingly much lower than it should be. I am running
> > modern equipment (quad-core 64bit) with windows 7 64-bit and
> > Mathematica 8.0. The $MaxNumber according to my machine is :
> > 1.233433712981650*10^323228458. According to reports at the URL below
> > the $MaxNumber on 64-bit machines in Mathematica 6.0 is up to
> > 2.093117322269914*10^646456781. This is also the number given in the
> > wolfram documentation. Any information on how to resolve this I would
> > kindly appreciate.
> >
> >
> http://www.mathkb.com/Uwe/Forum.aspx/mathematica/11731/What-is-MaxNumber-on-a-64-bit-Computer
> >
> > Many regards,
> >
> > Arthur
>
>


  • Prev by Date: Re: Wolfram, meet Stefan and Boltzmann
  • Next by Date: Re: $MaxNumber
  • Previous by thread: Re: $MaxNumber
  • Next by thread: Re: $MaxNumber