MathGroup Archive 2011

[Date Index] [Thread Index] [Author Index]

Search the Archive

Re: Defining Formatting and Notation

  • To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
  • Subject: [mg119242] Re: Defining Formatting and Notation
  • From: Peter Breitfeld <phbrf at t-online.de>
  • Date: Wed, 25 May 2011 19:34:34 -0400 (EDT)
  • References: <iraq0r$lm0$1@smc.vnet.net> <irijmf$qc9$1@smc.vnet.net>

<a|b> seems to be BraKet[{a},{b}]
but I too found no possibility to get <a|H|b> displayed.

//Peter

David Bailey wrote:

> At 8.0.1, Bra[1] and Ket[1] do display in the normal quantum mechanical 
> notation, without actually evaluating. This is, of course, exactly what 
> you need, because you provide the definition as required.
>
> However, although there is also a System` symbol called BraKet, I can't 
> find a way to use it to expressions like:
>
> <a|b> or <a|H|b>
>
> David Bailey
> http://www.dbaileyconsultancy.co.uk
>
>

-- 
_________________________________________________________________
Peter Breitfeld, Bad Saulgau, Germany -- http://www.pBreitfeld.de


  • Prev by Date: Re: Position
  • Next by Date: Re: NDSolve issues with initial and boundary conditions (corrected
  • Previous by thread: Re: Defining Formatting and Notation
  • Next by thread: there's shorter calculation time for motre datasets