Mathematica 9 is now available
Services & Resources / Wolfram Forums / MathGroup Archive
-----

MathGroup Archive 2011

[Date Index] [Thread Index] [Author Index]

Search the Archive

Re: Simple question about inverse of a function

  • To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
  • Subject: [mg122606] Re: Simple question about inverse of a function
  • From: "E. Martín-Serrano" <eMartinSerrano at telefonica.net>
  • Date: Thu, 3 Nov 2011 03:45:20 -0500 (EST)
  • Delivered-to: l-mathgroup@mail-archive0.wolfram.com
  • References: <201111010501.AAA14719@smc.vnet.net> <201111021122.GAA03555@smc.vnet.net>

Both, David's and Bobby's (without beep) solutions work perfectly for me
too.

The David's plot looks pretty illustrative.

$Version:   "8.0.1.0  for Microsoft Windows (64-bit) (February 23, 2011)"





-----Mensaje original-----
De: DrMajorBob [mailto:btreat1 at austin.rr.com]
Enviado el: mi=E9rcoles, 02 de noviembre de 2011 12:22
Para: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
Asunto: Re: Simple question about inverse of a function

It works perfectly here (with an error beep you can ignore), and this does
the same... without the beep:

Clear[f, g]
f[theta_][t_] := (1 - t)^theta
g[theta_] = Quiet@InverseFunction[f[theta]]

1 - #1^(1/theta) &

$Version

"8.0 for Mac OS X x86 (64-bit) (October 5, 2011)"

Bobby

On Tue, 01 Nov 2011 00:01:55 -0500, Mikael <mikaen.anderson.1969 at gmail.com>
wrote:

> Thanks David for your reply but unfortunately the solution does not
> work for me. I am running Mathematica 8 under Windows 7 and the last
> expression below does not result in any solution for me (I waited
> several minutes). This is a copy of my notebook which is exactly what
> you suggested:
>
> Clear[f,g]
> conditions=0<=t<=1&&1<=theta<=Infinity;
> f[theta_][t_]:=(1-t)^theta
> g[theta_]=Assuming[conditions,InverseFunction[f[theta]]]
>


--
DrMajorBob at yahoo.com






  • Prev by Date: Re: Significant Gene expression analysis in Mathematica
  • Next by Date: Re: Bernoulli Numbers
  • Previous by thread: Re: Simple question about inverse of a function
  • Next by thread: Re: Simple question about inverse of a function