|
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
[Author Index]
Re: Bug in FourierTransform?
- To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
- Subject: [mg122685] Re: Bug in FourierTransform?
- From: Rui <rui.rojo at gmail.com>
- Date: Sun, 6 Nov 2011 05:54:39 -0500 (EST)
- Delivered-to: l-mathgroup@mail-archive0.wolfram.com
- References: <j930t0$a8v$1@smc.vnet.net>
- Reply-to: comp.soft-sys.math.mathematica at googlegroups.com
I know the # symbol, I was using it to implement fourier transforms of functions, with something like this
Evaluate@FourierTransform[f1[\[FormalT]], \[FormalT], #]&.
I had done it a while ago in a package and just the other day I discovered it failed for these special cases.
Of course, I can understand that FourierTransform might just need symbols as last argument, but I thought it didn't.
I just changed the pure function to a Function[p, Evaluate at ...] and it all seems fine now.
Thanks
Prev by Date:
Series expansion question
Next by Date:
What gets put in ~/.Mathematica and why?
Previous by thread:
Re: Bug in FourierTransform?
Next by thread:
Constraint evaluation in NMinimize
|