Services & Resources / Wolfram Forums / MathGroup Archive
-----

MathGroup Archive 2011

[Date Index] [Thread Index] [Author Index]

Search the Archive

Re: How to evaluate parts of an expression, but not other parts?

  • To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
  • Subject: [mg122689] Re: How to evaluate parts of an expression, but not other parts?
  • From: Bob Hanlon <hanlonr357 at gmail.com>
  • Date: Sun, 6 Nov 2011 05:55:23 -0500 (EST)
  • Delivered-to: l-mathgroup@mail-archive0.wolfram.com
  • References: <201111050945.EAA10308@smc.vnet.net>

a = f[x];
b = g[x];
c = 2 f[x];
d = f[x] + 3 g[x];

expr = Hold[((a + b) + (c + d))];

ReplacePart[expr, {
  Position[expr, Literal[a]] -> a,
  Position[expr, Literal[b]] -> b,
  Position[expr, Literal[c]] -> c,
  Position[expr, Literal[d]] -> d}]

Hold[(f[x] + g[x]) + (2 f[x] + (f[x] + 3 g[x]))]


Bob Hanlon


On Sat, Nov 5, 2011 at 5:45 AM, Julian Francis
<julian.w.francis at gmail.com> wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> I'd like to use the TreePlot function to visualise the expression of a
> dynamic programming problem I am working on.
>
> If I have something like: ( (a+b) + (c+d )
>
> Mathematica helpfully simplifies this to: a + b + c + d
>
> But I'd prefer it to be in the original form.
>
> I can't write Hold[ ( (a+b) + (c+d) )] because I do want a,b,c & d to
> be evaluated.
>
> I want to write something like:
> Hold[ ( (Evaluate[a]+Evaluate[b]) + (Evaluate[c]+Evaluate[d]) ) ]
>
> But this just leaves the Evaluate expressions unevaluated.
>
> Any help greatly appreciated.
>
> Thanks,
> Julian.
>



  • Prev by Date: Re: Part // interesting undocumented feature
  • Next by Date: Re: How to evaluate parts of an expression, but not other parts?
  • Previous by thread: Re: How to evaluate parts of an expression, but not other parts?
  • Next by thread: Re: How to evaluate parts of an expression, but not other parts?