Re: Replace in an elegant way
- To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
- Subject: [mg122879] Re: Replace in an elegant way
- From: DrMajorBob <btreat1 at austin.rr.com>
- Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2011 07:06:35 -0500 (EST)
- Delivered-to: l-mathgroup@mail-archive0.wolfram.com
- References: <201111130943.EAA29993@smc.vnet.net>
- Reply-to: drmajorbob at yahoo.com
It may be inelegant, but so is the thing you want to do. expr/.{theta[m]->tm,theta'[m]->tmp,m->dd}/.{tm->theta[m],tmp->(theta^\[Prime])[m]}//Timing {0.000133,(1+theta[m])^2/(1-dd)-lambda (theta[m]+(1/(1-dd))(dd+lambda-dd lambda) (1+theta[m]) (1+theta[m]-lambda theta[m])+(dd (theta^\[Prime])[m])/lambda)} Bobby On Sun, 13 Nov 2011 03:43:13 -0600, Mirko <dashiell at web.de> wrote: > Hi all, > I have following equation: > > ((1 + theta[m])^2)/(1 - m) - lambda*((theta[m] + ((lambda + m - > lambda*m)*(1 + theta[m])*(1 + theta[m] - lambda*theta[m]))/(1 - m) + > (m*Derivative[1][theta][m])/lambda)) > > I want to replace all m that are not an argument of theta[m] or the > Derivative. However, if I use > /., it replaces all m. If I use Replace[expr,m->qq] it doesn't replace > anything. (qq is the one I want to replace with). If I specify any > level, it doesn't change anything, unless I use -1, but then I replace > everything. > > Do you know how I solve this problem? > Right now I use: > //. Derivative[y_][theta][m] -> Derivative[y][theta][dd] //. > theta[m] -> theta[dd] /. m -> qq //. > Derivative[y_][theta][dd] -> Derivative[y][theta][m] //. > theta[dd] -> theta[m] > > but this is not elegant at all (and takes slightly longer). > -- DrMajorBob at yahoo.com
- References:
- Replace in an elegant way
- From: Mirko <dashiell@web.de>
- Replace in an elegant way