Mathematica 9 is now available
Services & Resources / Wolfram Forums / MathGroup Archive
-----

MathGroup Archive 2011

[Date Index] [Thread Index] [Author Index]

Search the Archive

Re: Solve - takes very long time

  • To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
  • Subject: [mg121870] Re: Solve - takes very long time
  • From: Ray Koopman <koopman at sfu.ca>
  • Date: Wed, 5 Oct 2011 04:03:06 -0400 (EDT)
  • Delivered-to: l-mathgroup@mail-archive0.wolfram.com

I was wondering if something like that might be possible, but it 
didn't jump out at me. If I had figured it out, I might have used 
  Pick[dual, dual.Range@9, 0]
instead of
  dual[[Flatten at Position[dual.Range@9, 0]]].  
It's a little easier to read, and on my system it's just as fast.

----- DrMajorBob <btreat1 at austin.rr.com> wrote:
> Or even better (9 times faster):
> 
> interpret[s_List] :=
>   Flatten@{FromDigits /@ Transpose@Take[#, 3],
>       FromDigits@Flatten@Take[#, -3]} &[
>    Flatten@Position[s, #, {1}, 2] & /@ {100, 10, 1, -100, -10, -1}]
> Timing[
>   dual = Permutations@{100, 10, 1, 100, 10, 1, -100, -10, -1};
>   interpret /@ dual[[Flatten at Position[dual.Range@9, 0]]] // Sort]
> 
> {0.010079, {{124, 659, 783}, {125, 739, 864}, {127, 359, 486}, {127,
>     368, 495}, {128, 439, 567}, {134, 658, 792}, {142, 596, 738}, {142,
>      695, 837}, {143, 586, 729}, {152, 487, 639}, {152, 784,
>     936}, {162, 387, 549}, {162, 783, 945}, {173, 286, 459}, {173, 295,
>      468}, {182, 394, 576}, {182, 493, 675}, {214, 569, 783}, {214,
>     659, 873}, {215, 478, 693}, {215, 748, 963}, {216, 378, 594}, {216,
>      738, 954}, {218, 349, 567}, {218, 439, 657}, {234, 657,
>     891}, {235, 746, 981}, {241, 596, 837}, {243, 576, 819}, {243, 675,
>      918}, {251, 397, 648}, {271, 593, 864}, {271, 683, 954}, {281,
>     394, 675}, {314, 658, 972}, {317, 529, 846}, {317, 628, 945}, {324,
>      567, 891}, {324, 657, 981}, {341, 586, 927}, {342, 576,
>     918}, {352, 467, 819}}}
> 
> Bobby
> 
> On Tue, 04 Oct 2011 15:52:09 -0500, DrMajorBob <btreat1 at austin.rr.com>  
> wrote:
> 
>> I missed the fact that you'd already explained this, but the same idea  
>> yields THIS solution:
>>
>> interpret[s_List] :=
>>   Flatten@{FromDigits /@ Transpose@Take[#, 3],
>>       FromDigits@Flatten@Take[#, -3]} &[
>>    Flatten@Position[s, #] & /@ {100, 10, 1, -100, -10, -1}]
>> nine = Range@9;
>> interpret /@
>>    Select[Permutations@{100, 10, 1, 100, 10, 1, -100, -10, -1},
>>           #.nine == 0 &] // Timing
>>
>> {0.096459, {{127, 359, 486}, {127, 368, 495}, {128, 439, 567}, {125,
>>     739, 864}, {124, 659, 783}, {182, 394, 576}, {162, 387, 549}, {182,
>>      493, 675}, {162, 783, 945}, {142, 596, 738}, {142, 695,
>>     837}, {152, 487, 639}, {152, 784, 936}, {173, 295, 468}, {173, 286,
>>      459}, {143, 586, 729}, {134, 658, 792}, {218, 349, 567}, {216,
>>     378, 594}, {218, 439, 657}, {216, 738, 954}, {214, 569, 783}, {214,
>>      659, 873}, {215, 478, 693}, {215, 748, 963}, {317, 529,
>>     846}, {317, 628, 945}, {314, 658, 972}, {281, 394, 675}, {251, 397,
>>      648}, {271, 593, 864}, {271, 683, 954}, {241, 596, 837}, {341,
>>     586, 927}, {243, 576, 819}, {243, 675, 918}, {342, 576, 918}, {352,
>>      467, 819}, {234, 657, 891}, {235, 746, 981}, {324, 567,
>>     891}, {324, 657, 981}}}
>>
>> That uses far less memory (1/8 as many permutations), and it's also  
>> faster:
>>
>> FromDigits /@ Partition[#, 3] & /@
>>    Select[Permutations@
>>      Range@9, #[[1]] < #[[4]] && #[[2]] < #[[5]] && #[[3]] < #[[6]] && \
>> #.{100, 10, 1, 100, 10, 1, -100, -10, -1} == 0 &] // Timing
>>
>> {2.02554, {{124, 659, 783}, {125, 739, 864}, {127, 359, 486}, {127,
>>     368, 495}, {128, 439, 567}, {134, 658, 792}, {142, 596, 738}, {142,
>>      695, 837}, {143, 586, 729}, {152, 487, 639}, {152, 784,
>>     936}, {162, 387, 549}, {162, 783, 945}, {173, 286, 459}, {173, 295,
>>      468}, {182, 394, 576}, {182, 493, 675}, {214, 569, 783}, {214,
>>     659, 873}, {215, 478, 693}, {215, 748, 963}, {216, 378, 594}, {216,
>>      738, 954}, {218, 349, 567}, {218, 439, 657}, {234, 657,
>>     891}, {235, 746, 981}, {241, 596, 837}, {243, 576, 819}, {243, 675,
>>      918}, {251, 397, 648}, {271, 593, 864}, {271, 683, 954}, {281,
>>     394, 675}, {314, 658, 972}, {317, 529, 846}, {317, 628, 945}, {324,
>>      567, 891}, {324, 657, 981}, {341, 586, 927}, {342, 576,
>>     918}, {352, 467, 819}}}
>>
>> Timing[Length[
>>    solns = FromDigits /@ Partition[#, 3] & /@
>>      Select[Permutations@
>>        Range@9, #[[1]] < #[[4]] && #.{100, 10, 1, 100, 10,
>>            1, -100, -10, -1} == 0 &]]]
>>
>> {1.56286, 168}
>>
>> Surely "interpret" could be simpler, but I haven't thought of a way, as  
>> yet... and it doesn't need to be fast.
>>
>> Bobby
>>
>> On Tue, 04 Oct 2011 13:25:36 -0500, Ray Koopman <koopman at sfu.ca> wrote:
>>
>>> The basic condition can be written as
>>>
>>> 100*(x2 + y2) + 10*(x1 + y1) + (x0 + y0) = 100*z2 + 10*z1 + z0,
>>>
>>> in which form it is clear that we can always swap corresponding xi and
>>> yi, and that solutions therefore come is sets of 8. Requiring xi < yi
>>> for all i is just a way of picking a "canonical" member of each set.
>>>
>>> ----- DrMajorBob <btreat1 at austin.rr.com> wrote:
>>>> The conditions #[[2]] < #[[5]] and #[[3]] < #[[6]] do not belong,  
>>>> however.
>>>>
>>>> Bobby
>>>>
>>>> On Tue, 04 Oct 2011 00:30:53 -0500, Ray Koopman <koopman at sfu.ca> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On Oct 3, 1:26 am, Fredob <fredrik.dob... at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I tried the following on Mathematica 8 and it doesn't seem to stop
>>>>>> running (waited 40 minutes on a 2.6 Ghz processor w 6 GB of primary
>>>>>> memory).
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Solve[
>>>>>>  {100*Subscript[x, 2] + 10*Subscript[x, 1] + Subscript[x, 0] +
>>>>>>   100*Subscript[y, 2] + 10*Subscript[y, 1] + Subscript[y, 0] ==
>>>>>>   100*Subscript[z, 2] + 10*Subscript[z, 1] + Subscript[z, 0],
>>>>>>   Subscript[x, 0] > 0, Subscript[y, 0] > 0, Subscript[z, 0] > 0,
>>>>>>   Subscript[x, 1] > 0, Subscript[y, 1] > 0, Subscript[z, 1] > 0,
>>>>>>   Subscript[x, 2] > 0, Subscript[y, 2] > 0, Subscript[z, 2] > 0,
>>>>>>   Subscript[x, 0] <= 9, Subscript[y, 0] <= 9, Subscript[z, 0] <= 9,
>>>>>>   Subscript[x, 1] <= 9, Subscript[y, 1] <= 9, Subscript[z, 1] <= 9,
>>>>>>   Subscript[x, 2] <= 9, Subscript[y, 2] <= 9, Subscript[z, 2] <= 9,
>>>>>>   Subscript[x, 0] != Subscript[y, 0] != Subscript[z, 0] !=
>>>>>>   Subscript[x, 1] != Subscript[y, 1] != Subscript[z, 1] !=
>>>>>>   Subscript[x, 2] != Subscript[y, 2] != Subscript[z, 2]},
>>>>>>  {Subscript[x, 2], Subscript[y, 2], Subscript[z, 2], Subscript[x, 1],
>>>>>>   Subscript[y, 1], Subscript[z, 1], Subscript[x, 0], Subscript[y, 0],
>>>>>>   Subscript[z, 0] },
>>>>>>  Integers]
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The problem was a homework for my daugther where you are supposed to
>>>>>> use all digits to build - but only once - 2 three digit numbers and
>>>>>> addition.
>>>>>
>>>>> For each of the 42 solutions found by the brute force search given
>>>>> below there are seven other solutions that may be obtained by
>>>>> interchanging x0,y0 and/or x1,y1 and/or x2,y2.
>>>>>
>>>>> FromDigits/@Partition[#,3]& /@ Select[Permutations@Range@9,
>>>>>   #[[1]] < #[[4]] && #[[2]] < #[[5]] && #[[3]] < #[[6]] &&
>>>>>   #.{100,10,1,100,10,1,-100,-10,-1} == 0 &]
>>>>>
>>>>> {{124,659,783}, {125,739,864}, {127,359,486},
>>>>>  {127,368,495}, {128,439,567}, {134,658,792},
>>>>>  {142,596,738}, {142,695,837}, {143,586,729},
>>>>>  {152,487,639}, {152,784,936}, {162,387,549},
>>>>>  {162,783,945}, {173,286,459}, {173,295,468},
>>>>>  {182,394,576}, {182,493,675}, {214,569,783},
>>>>>  {214,659,873}, {215,478,693}, {215,748,963},
>>>>>  {216,378,594}, {216,738,954}, {218,349,567},
>>>>>  {218,439,657}, {234,657,891}, {235,746,981},
>>>>>  {241,596,837}, {243,576,819}, {243,675,918},
>>>>>  {251,397,648}, {271,593,864}, {271,683,954},
>>>>>  {281,394,675}, {314,658,972}, {317,529,846},
>>>>>  {317,628,945}, {324,567,891}, {324,657,981},
>>>>>  {341,586,927}, {342,576,918}, {352,467,819}}



  • Prev by Date: Re: Solve - takes very long time
  • Next by Date: Re: Solve - takes very long time
  • Previous by thread: Re: Solve - takes very long time
  • Next by thread: Re: Solve - takes very long time