[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
[Author Index]
A possible typo in the program of "Mathematica Navigator" by Heikki
*To*: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
*Subject*: [mg122114] A possible typo in the program of "Mathematica Navigator" by Heikki
*From*: Nabeel Butt <nabeel.butt at gmail.com>
*Date*: Sat, 15 Oct 2011 06:02:16 -0400 (EDT)
*Delivered-to*: l-mathgroup@mail-archive0.wolfram.com
Dear All,
In the chapter on 'optimization' the book presents a program to
implement Kuhn Tucker conditions.I have indicated where the book appears to
make the typo in the code I show below :
kktOptimize[f_, g_List, h_List, x_List, \[Epsilon]_: 10.^-12] :=
Module[{\[Lambda]\[Lambda] =
Array[\[Lambda], Length[g]], \[Mu]\[Mu] = Array[\[Mu], Length[h]],
x\[Lambda]\[Mu], eqns, sol, realsol, nrealsol, ineqs, pos, cand},
x\[Lambda]\[Mu] = Join[x, \[Lambda]\[Lambda], \[Mu]\[Mu]];
eqns = Thread[
Join[D[f + \[Lambda]\[Lambda].g + \[Mu]\[Mu].h, {x}],
g, \[Mu]\[Mu] h] == 0];
sol = Union[Solve[eqns, x\[Lambda]\[Mu]]];
realsol = Select[sol, FreeQ[Chop[N[#], \[Epsilon]], Complex] &];
If[realsol == {},
Return["No real solutions; try a larger \[Epsilon]"]];
nrealsol =
Thread[x\[Lambda]\[Mu] -> #] & /@
Chop[N[x\[Lambda]\[Mu] /. realsol], \[Epsilon]];
(*Here below this line the book makes a typo and I have made the appropriate
correction -instead of just h<=epsilon it also joined the mu vector *)
ineqs = Thread[h <= \[Epsilon]];
pos = Position[(And @@ #) & /@ (ineqs /. nrealsol), True];
If[pos == {},
Return["Inequalities not satisfied; try a larger \[Epsilon]"]];
cand = Union[Sort /@ Extract[realsol, pos]];
First[Sort[Transpose[{f /. cand, cand}], #1[[1]] < #2[[1]] &]]]
Now the above program works fine after I have made the correction.For
example you can run :
f = -((x - 2)^(1.5) + (y - 3)^2);
h1 = x + y - 9;
h2 = 2 - x;
h3 = 3 - y;
kktOptimize[f, {}, {h1, h2, h3}, {x, y}]
OR if you are too eager :
f = -((Log /@ x - 2)^(1.5) + (y - 3)^2);
h1 = x + y - 9;
h2 = 2 - x;
h3 = 3 - y;
kktOptimize[f, {}, {h1, h2, h3}, {x, y}]
Work fines now.Perhaps you guys already know but it is good to point out
errors so that they could be corrected in the next edition !.
It is also possible I am wrong so nice to know if I am making errors !
Thanks...
Nabeel
<http://t2.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcRd4WJa3qO12skxxSAppQ9HimoQsMP5o--uCIe7yxZahJqlkN4z>
"We have not succeeded in answering all our problems.The answers we have
found only serve to raise a whole set of new questions.In some ways we feel
that we are as confused as ever,but we believe we are confused on a higher
level and about more important things."
"Maybe one day we get to see all the beauty present in this world"
"Life can only be understood going backwards but it must be lived going
forwards"
Nabeel Butt
UWO,London
Ontario, Canada
Prev by Date:
**Re: Fitting step function**
Next by Date:
**Re: Constructing a huge graph**
Previous by thread:
**Re: Limitation on vector length in NDSolve?**
Next by thread:
**Remark on closing the lernel**
| |