[Date Index] [Thread Index] [Author Index]

Re: Ticks without labels

• To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
• Subject: [mg122268] Re: Ticks without labels
• From: DrMajorBob <btreat1 at austin.rr.com>
• Date: Sun, 23 Oct 2011 06:22:09 -0400 (EDT)
• Delivered-to: l-mathgroup@mail-archive0.wolfram.com
• References: <201110190935.FAA20123@smc.vnet.net> <j7p1li$5jl$1@smc.vnet.net>
• Reply-to: drmajorbob at yahoo.com

> Could we get a commitment from Wolfram to fix some of these long
> standing bugs in the next release?

I seriously doubt it.

Bobby

On Sat, 22 Oct 2011 05:07:47 -0500, Armand Tamzarian  
<mike.honeychurch at gmail.com> wrote:

> On Oct 21, 9:31 pm, Helen Read <read... at gmail.com> wrote:
>> I'd also like an option for making the Ticks themselves taller. After
>> exporting a plot and sizing it down for use on say a quiz, often the
>> ticks are so small as to be just about invisible.
>>
>> HPR
>>
>> On 10/20/2011 7:45 AM, Roberto Cavaliere wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> > Try this:
>>
>> > TicksStyle ->  Directive[FontSize ->0, FontColor ->  White]
>>
>> > I hope in the future Ticks will allow to separate directives for  
>> ticks =
> and
>> > for ticks labels, so, for instance, to specify something like
>> > Ticks->Automatics and TicksLabels->None
>>
>> > ~roberto
>>
>> > -----Messaggio originale-----
>> > Da: solid-state [mailto:phm... at gmail.com]
>> > Inviato: mercoled=EC 19 ottobre 2011 11:35
>> > A: mathgr... at smc.vnet.net
>> > Oggetto: Ticks without labels
>>
>> > Hello, everybody!
>>
>> > I've got a question about plots. Can anyone, please, suggest a simple  
>> m=
> ethod
>> > for drawing ticks without labels?
>>
>> > Thank you in advance.
>
>
> If you mean that when you export as say a bitmap with a high image
> resolution that the ticks virtually disappear, this is a known bug
> that has been present for awhile but doesn't seem to get fixed.
>
> e.g. Export["plot.tiff", Plot[x, {x, 1, 4}], ImageResolution -> 600]
>
> you need a microscope to see the ticks!!
>
> Could we get a commitment from Wolfram to fix some of these long
> standing bugs in the next release? e.g. if something was a bug in 6,
> 7, and 8 should it really be still there in 9??
>
> Mike
>


-- 
DrMajorBob at yahoo.com

• References:
  • Ticks without labels
    • From: solid-state <phmech@gmail.com>