       Re: Full simplify problem

• To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
• Subject: [mg122333] Re: Full simplify problem
• From: "A. Lapraitis" <ffcitatos at gmail.com>
• Date: Tue, 25 Oct 2011 06:18:59 -0400 (EDT)
• Delivered-to: l-mathgroup@mail-archive0.wolfram.com
• References: <D3C63570-91CA-489E-B8B7-661844B401BC@mimuw.edu.pl>

```First of all, thanks to all the people answering!

The problem is more complicated, indeed, this is just the minimal working
example. However, I still do not understand Mathematica's behaviour.

1. I thought that the whole point of Count[#, x, Infinity]& was to
distinguish between Exp[x] and Exp[y+z] in favour of Exp[x]. However, the
same is true for the LeafCount function (it gives 3 and 5 respectively). Why
is not a good complexity function in this case?

2. I was trying a different workaround and have noticed a dependence of the
result on the names of the variables:

In:= Clear["Global`*"]
In:= Assuming[x == d && d == y + z, FullSimplify[E^x - E^(y + z)]]
Out= E^x - E^(y + z)
In:= Assuming[a == d && d == b + c, FullSimplify[E^a - E^(b + c)]]
Out= 0

Can anyone explain this?

```

• Prev by Date: Another basic (?) question about RecurrenceTable and replacement
• Next by Date: Re: Integral points on elliptic curves
• Previous by thread: Re: Full simplify problem
• Next by thread: Re: Full simplify problem