Re: Bug with Sequence and Assignment by Part...

*To*: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net*Subject*: [mg121675] Re: Bug with Sequence and Assignment by Part...*From*: BernieTheJet <berniethejet at gmail.com>*Date*: Sun, 25 Sep 2011 05:42:00 -0400 (EDT)*Delivered-to*: l-mathgroup@mail-archive0.wolfram.com*References*: <j5f6ai$q8a$1@smc.vnet.net>

Thank you Leonid for the link, and thank you Oleksandr for pointing me to OwnValues, I hadn't ever used that before. So everyone's opinion seems to be that this is not a bug and that this construct is something of a manipulation of proper Mathematica syntax - something approaching a hack - because Sequence is a low-level function that one should understand Mathematica's evaluation sequence before using. Ok, that is fine. Certainly that is one interpretation ('when looked at from a certain perspective'). Certainly one can't claim that the use of Sequence is hidden, or in anyway indicated to be a 'low-level' operator by its presentation in the Help, except insofar as it is given a perfunctory presentation. But I think that it is just as valid to say that this 'bug' it is counter to one of my favourite Mathematica design philosophy which is, somewhat similar to Apple in this regard, to remove all the tedious and computer-ish work from the user's care, to take care of that behind the scenes, while still delivering as much of the power of the language as possible. So for users to have to understand Mathematica's evaluation sequence, SequenceHold (which I have never once used, or perhaps even needed), or OwnValues (ditto) in order to get logical behaviour from a function seems to clearly go against this philosophy. Of course one can counter that there is another design philosophy in Mathematica of mixing the best of all worlds, and never forcing oneself to strictly subscribe to any one design structure, which I also support. For me, I just guess that Sequence is a 'hack' that WRI implemented to get around the limitation that everything be a List. A 'hack' in that it defied their initial plan that everything be representable as Lists, and then a 'hack' in that they couldn't get it to work in a logical fashion in all subsequent interactions with other functions, as seen here. B

**Follow-Ups**:**Re: Bug with Sequence and Assignment by Part...***From:*DrMajorBob <btreat1@austin.rr.com>