Re: fyi, small note on using Mathematica for object based programming

*To*: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net*Subject*: [mg125927] Re: fyi, small note on using Mathematica for object based programming*From*: Andrzej Kozlowski <akozlowski at gmail.com>*Date*: Sat, 7 Apr 2012 05:58:23 -0400 (EDT)*Delivered-to*: l-mathgroup@mail-archive0.wolfram.com*References*: <201204060958.FAA22979@smc.vnet.net>

While I completely agree with the sentiment expressed in the second line, I don't think the first one is true, at least not in any sense of "object-oriented" I am familiar with. Andrzej On 6 Apr 2012, at 11:58, DrMajorBob wrote: > Mathematica is already object-oriented WITHOUT all that. What a lot of > overhead for nothing. > > Bobby > > On Thu, 05 Apr 2012 04:49:54 -0500, Nasser M. Abbasi <nma at 12000.org> wrote: > >> >> Just FYI, >> >> I wrote this small note on using Mathematica for object-based >> programming. I found that it works really well for me. >> >> Nothing too advanced, just a simple way of using Module[] but >> in a way to emulate object based programming that I did not know >> about before. >> >> http://12000.org/my_notes/object_based_in_mathematica/v1.html >> >> --Nasser >> > > > -- > DrMajorBob at yahoo.com >

**References**:**Re: fyi, small note on using Mathematica for object based programming***From:*DrMajorBob <btreat1@austin.rr.com>