[Date Index] [Thread Index] [Author Index]

Re: fyi, small note on using Mathematica for object based programming

• To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
• Subject: [mg125927] Re: fyi, small note on using Mathematica for object based programming
• From: Andrzej Kozlowski <akozlowski at gmail.com>
• Date: Sat, 7 Apr 2012 05:58:23 -0400 (EDT)
• Delivered-to: l-mathgroup@mail-archive0.wolfram.com
• References: <201204060958.FAA22979@smc.vnet.net>

While I completely agree with the sentiment expressed in the second 
line, I don't think the first one is true, at least not in any sense of 
"object-oriented" I am familiar with.

Andrzej


On 6 Apr 2012, at 11:58, DrMajorBob wrote:

> Mathematica is already object-oriented WITHOUT all that. What a lot of 

> overhead for nothing.
>
> Bobby
>
> On Thu, 05 Apr 2012 04:49:54 -0500, Nasser M. Abbasi <nma at 12000.org> 
wrote:
>
>>
>> Just FYI,
>>
>> I wrote this small note on using Mathematica for object-based
>> programming. I found that it works really well for me.
>>
>> Nothing too advanced, just a simple way of using Module[] but
>> in a way to emulate object based programming that I did not know
>> about before.
>>
>> http://12000.org/my_notes/object_based_in_mathematica/v1.html
>>
>> --Nasser
>>
>
>
> --
> DrMajorBob at yahoo.com
>

• References:
  • Re: fyi, small note on using Mathematica for object based programming
    • From: DrMajorBob <btreat1@austin.rr.com>