|
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
[Author Index]
Re: Symmetrizing function arguments
- To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
- Subject: [mg127618] Re: Symmetrizing function arguments
- From: Hauke Reddmann <fc3a501 at uni-hamburg.de>
- Date: Wed, 8 Aug 2012 21:32:19 -0400 (EDT)
- Delivered-to: l-mathgroup@mail-archive0.wolfram.com
- Delivered-to: l-mathgroup@wolfram.com
- Delivered-to: mathgroup-newout@smc.vnet.net
- Delivered-to: mathgroup-newsend@smc.vnet.net
- References: <30176350.22535.1344323226826.JavaMail.root@m06> <jvt3rj$m00$1@smc.vnet.net>
Essentially I did it this way - just not with the permutations
but the tetrahedral permutations. (The snag with my cheapo
implementation is that I may not assign special values since this
interferes with the sort.)
--
Hauke Reddmann <:-EX8 fc3a501 at uni-hamburg.de
Out on deck the dawn arrived
Your grey sweater oversized
The rooftops glimmered before our eyes
Prev by Date:
Re: Symmetrizing function arguments
Next by Date:
NDSolve: large relative error without error message
Previous by thread:
Re: Symmetrizing function arguments
Next by thread:
Re: Symmetrizing function arguments
|