Re: How to look for this kind of error
- To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
- Subject: [mg124591] Re: How to look for this kind of error
- From: Murray Eisenberg <murray at math.umass.edu>
- Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2012 07:10:50 -0500 (EST)
- Delivered-to: l-mathgroup@mail-archive0.wolfram.com
- References: <201201241008.FAA20312@smc.vnet.net>
- Reply-to: murray at math.umass.edu
Remember that Mathematica applies particular rules before it applies general rules. So a lot depends on how TestCodazzi is defined. On 1/24/12 5:08 AM, Sam Takoy wrote: > Hi, > > Suppose I have a very complicated function TestCodazzi and > > TestCodazzi[0,2,3] > > returns one answer while > > TestCodazzi[0, x, y] //FullSimplify /. {x->2, y->3} > > returns a totally different answer. Now, there is a lot going on and I > could start testing different parts of my code. However, could > Mathematica show me the instances where it was making certain > assumptions that may not be true, and so help me in tracking down this > discrepancy? > > Many thanks in advance, > > Sam > -- Murray Eisenberg murray at math.umass.edu Mathematics & Statistics Dept. Lederle Graduate Research Tower phone 413 549-1020 (H) University of Massachusetts 413 545-2859 (W) 710 North Pleasant Street fax 413 545-1801 Amherst, MA 01003-9305
- References:
- How to look for this kind of error
- From: Sam Takoy <sam.takoy@yahoo.com>
- How to look for this kind of error