Re: Could someone else verify that an example from the Numerical
- To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
- Subject: [mg127327] Re: Could someone else verify that an example from the Numerical
- From: W Craig Carter <ccarter at MIT.EDU>
- Date: Tue, 17 Jul 2012 01:31:05 -0400 (EDT)
- Delivered-to: l-mathgroup@mail-archive0.wolfram.com
- Delivered-to: mathgroup-newout@smc.vnet.net
- Delivered-to: mathgroup-newsend@smc.vnet.net
- References: <jttv31$gut$1@smc.vnet.net> <20120716090008.73A2A6828@smc.vnet.net>
Thank you Nasser, Syd, and Roland, I had to type it in---I couldn't copy and paste from the pdf. However, I don't think it would *ever* occurred to me that the problem = was that the Integer tau had to be a Real. I'm happy to have the = resolution, but very surprised by the nature of the resolution! W Craig Carter Professor of Materials Science, MIT On Jul 16, , at Mon Jul 16, 12 @5:00 AM, Nasser M. Abbasi wrote: > On 7/15/2012 3:30 AM, W Craig Carter wrote: > > > Ah! But you changed the code from the pdf file ! > > You wrote > >> {tau, 0, 20, 5}], 2]] >> > > Notice the limit you have on the tau. You wrote > > {tau, 0, 20, 5} > > while it should be > > {tau, 0, 20., 5.}
- References:
- Re: Could someone else verify that an example from the Numerical
- From: "Nasser M. Abbasi" <nma@12000.org>
- Re: Could someone else verify that an example from the Numerical