MathGroup Archive 2012

[Date Index] [Thread Index] [Author Index]

Search the Archive

Re: new functional operator

  • To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
  • Subject: [mg125431] Re: new functional operator
  • From: roby <roby.nowak at gmail.com>
  • Date: Wed, 14 Mar 2012 00:33:46 -0500 (EST)
  • Delivered-to: l-mathgroup@mail-archive0.wolfram.com
  • References: <jjfd6e$7u7$1@smc.vnet.net>

>
> I don't have any problem agreeing this notation looks nicer than say
>
> {1, 2, 3, 4} // f /@ # & // g /@ # &
>
> And, I can set up the definition in init.m so that it is always
> available without needing to define it in each notebook where I
> would use it.
>
> But it presents another issue. Unless you are writing code for
> yourself you will never share with someone else, you will be
> making your code much more difficult to understand.
>



Thats why I would prefer /// as postfix-map operator to be implemented
by the Mathematica staff.
Any Mathematica staff member listening ?

Robert



  • Prev by Date: Re: Trouble Getting Graphic Primitives in a Module to Display with Show Command
  • Next by Date: Button Behavior OnClick
  • Previous by thread: Re: new functional operator
  • Next by thread: Re: new functional operator