MathGroup Archive 2012

[Date Index] [Thread Index] [Author Index]

Search the Archive

Re: new functional operator

  • To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
  • Subject: [mg125582] Re: new functional operator
  • From: roby <roby.nowak at gmail.com>
  • Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2012 02:18:47 -0500 (EST)
  • Delivered-to: l-mathgroup@mail-archive0.wolfram.com
  • References: <jjfd6e$7u7$1@smc.vnet.net> <jjpakk$ov1$1@smc.vnet.net> <jk43ni$ds0$1@smc.vnet.net>

> That creates a information fog that makes *all* Mathematica code harder to understand, and Mathematica much harder to learn than it used to be.

{1, 2, 3, 4} /// f///g


> {1, 2, 3, 4} // f /@ # & // g /@ # &

sorry but I absolutly can't agree with your opinion in this case, the
former expression is more or less fogless and would be much easier to
understand.
The latter expression bears a lot of clutter.

Robert





  • Prev by Date: Re: Mathematica results different on different computers !
  • Next by Date: Re: Different answers in mathematica and my calculator.
  • Previous by thread: Re: new functional operator
  • Next by thread: Re: new functional operator