[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
[Author Index]
Re: Finding the real part of a symbolic complex expression
*To*: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
*Subject*: [mg126589] Re: Finding the real part of a symbolic complex expression
*From*: Murray Eisenberg <murray at math.umass.edu>
*Date*: Mon, 21 May 2012 05:58:58 -0400 (EDT)
*Delivered-to*: l-mathgroup@mail-archive0.wolfram.com
*References*: <201205200635.CAA04268@smc.vnet.net>
*Reply-to*: murray at math.umass.edu
As you discovered, the way to handle this is with ComplexExpand:
ComplexExpand[Re[(a + I b) (c + I d)]]
a c - b d
Clearly the function Re does not recognize such an Assuming expression.
What one might expect is that the following would work:
Simplify[Re[(a + I b) (c + I d)], Element[{a, b, c, d}, Reals]]
Alas, it simply doesn't. However, the following does:
Simplify[Re[Expand[(a + I b) (c + I d)]],
Element[{a, b, c, d}, Reals]]
On 5/20/12 2:35 AM, Jacare Omoplata wrote:
> I wanted to find the real part of (a + I b)(c + I d) , assuming a,b,c and d are real, "I" being Sqrt[-1].
>
> So I tried,
>
> Re[(a + I b) (c + I d)] /. Assuming -> Element[{a, b, c, d}, Reals]
>
> Nothing happens. What I get for output is,
>
> Re[(a+I b) (c+I d)]
>
> I found out that I can use the function "ComplexExpand" to expand the expression assuming a,b,c and d to be real. But I'm curious to know if there a way to make Mathematica use "Re" to find the real part?
>
--
Murray Eisenberg murray at math.umass.edu
Mathematics & Statistics Dept.
Lederle Graduate Research Tower phone 413 549-1020 (H)
University of Massachusetts 413 545-2859 (W)
710 North Pleasant Street fax 413 545-1801
Amherst, MA 01003-9305
Prev by Date:
**help with layman terms algorithm development?**
Next by Date:
**Re: clearing a variable with a dummy subscript**
Previous by thread:
**Re: Finding the real part of a symbolic complex expression**
Next by thread:
**Re: Finding the real part of a symbolic complex expression**
| |